How did the first animals reproduce? Mysterious creatures reveal clues

A new study reveals that ancient organisms known as rangeomorphs reproduced in two ways: through waterborne seed and 'runners' similar to strawberry plants. 

C. G. Kenchington
This illustration shows a Fractofusus community with clusters that arose from runners sent by the older generation.

Reproduction has been around since the dawn of time – it’s what has kept life on Earth. But many scientists are still in the dark about early procreation. A study published on Monday may answer some of these questions.

A new study by researchers at the University of Cambridge delves into the reproduction methods of what many believe to be the oldest complex organisms on Earth. According to the research, the organisms known as “rangeomorphs” lived 565 million years ago and looked similar to modern-day ferns. They thrived in the oceans and could reach up to two meters in length, although most were around 10 centimeters long. They did not appear to have mouths, organs, or means of moving, and probably absorbed nutrients from the water around them.

Then how was it possible for them to reproduce?

Researchers say the organisms adopted a “divide and conquer” type system that included two parts.

The organisms formed a kind of colony, beginning with "grandparents" and expanding into generations of offspring. It’s likely that the "grandparents" were born from ejected waterborne seeds or spores. Scientists are still unsure if this was sexual or asexual in nature. While "parents" and their offspring grew from "runners" sent out by the older generation, like strawberry plants. 

“Reproduction in this way made rangeomorphs highly successful, since they could both colonize new areas and rapidly spread once they got there,” said Emily Mitchell, lead author of the study, in a statement. “The capacity of these organisms to switch between two distinct modes of reproduction shows just how sophisticated their underlying biology was, which is remarkable at a point in time when most other forms of life were incredibly simple.”

But scientists still don’t know if the rangeomorphs should be classified as plants or as animals says Jack Matthews, a researcher and part of the team that found the fossils on the Canadian coastline.

“They could possibly be an early animal…. They’re certainly complex, multi-cellular organisms, but whether they are true animals is still something that is very much up for debate,” he told CBC News.

As Dr. Mitchell said, “Rangeomorphs don’t look like anything else in the fossil record, which is why they’re such a mystery. But we’ve developed a whole new way of looking at them, which has helped us understand them a lot better – most interestingly, how they reproduced.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.