Exploding rocket: What was aboard?

The private rocket that exploded spectacularly Tuesday evening moments after lifting off from a Virginia launch pad was carrying an array of science experiments.

NASA/Joel Kowsky
The Cygnus spacecraft housed atop the Antares rocket on Oct. 27 before the failed launch that destroyed the probe on Oct. 28, 2014.

When a private rocket exploded just after launch Tuesday (Oct. 28), science experiments developed by students, professional researchers and private companies went up in smoke.

The private spaceflight company Orbital Sciences Corp.'s Antares rocket was expected to launch the company's unmanned cargo-carrying Cygnus spacecraft on a mission to the International Space Station from Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia Tuesday evening. But about 6 seconds after launch, the Antares rocket exploded, presumably destroying Cygnus' cargo, including 26 tiny Earth-observing satellites and a spacecraft built to test tech that could be used for asteroid mining. (Reportedly, no people were injured as a result of the rocket failure.)

"We do want to express our disappointment that we were not able to fulfill our obligation to the International Space Station program and deliver this load of cargo, especially to the researchers who had science on board and the people that were counting on the various hardware and components that were going to the station," Orbital Executive Vice President Frank Culbertson said during a news conference after the rocket failure. [See images of the Antares explosion]

In total, Cygnus was carrying about 4,883 lbs. (2,215 kilograms) of cargo, with about 1,603 lbs. (727 kg) of that devoted to science.

The Antares explosion destroyed the Arkyd 3 (A3) spacecraft, a small technology demonstration from the company Planetary Resources. A3 was designed as a precursor to the Arkyd 100 Series — a group of space probes that could be used to hunt for asteroids that might be mined for resources.

"As this launch failure and history have demonstrated, spaceflight is inherently risky," Planetary Resources' Stacey Tearne told Space.com via email. "The A3 is the first example of our strategy to use space as our test bed, and to tolerate failures by building success into the development path. With the A3, the Planetary Resources team achieved most of our objectives when we delivered the spacecraft to the launch integration site, and for the past few months, we have been hard at work on our next vehicle, the Arkyd 6 (A6)."

The development timeline should not be affected by the rocket failure, and the company is expecting to launch the A6 spacecraft sometime in 2015, according to Tearne.

A fleet of 26 tiny satellites from San Francisco-based Planet Labs was destroyed during the explosion as well. After arriving at the space station, the CubeSats would have been deployed and used to observe Earth from space.

"Planet Labs understands the risks of launch," Planet Labs co-founder and CEO Will Marshall wrote of the rocket failure in an Oct. 28 blog post. "Our approach to mitigate these risks is to deploy our fleets of satellites on multiple launch vehicles, from multiple vendors. We also place more satellites in orbit than we require in each launch so that, if satellites fail in orbit, we ensure continuity."

Some of the experiments lost during the explosion would have studied astronauts' health in space. An experiment called "Drain Brain," for instance, would have gathered more data about how astronauts' blood flows in the weightlessness of the space station.

The student experiments destroyed in the Cygnus disaster were crafted to investigate a wide variety of studies as part of NASA's Student Spaceflight Experiments Program. The 18 projects included investigations into crystal growth in space, and how microgravity might affect milk's shelf life.

Editor's Note: NASA officials are urging residents of the area around the launch site to keep away from any rocket debris that might wash up on shore or be found on land. If you think you may have found pieces of the rocket, please call the incident response team at (757) 824-1295.

Follow Miriam Kramer @mirikramer and Google+. Follow us @SpacedotcomFacebook and Google+. Original article on Space.com.

Copyright 2014 SPACE.com, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Exploding rocket: What was aboard?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today