Indonesian cave art: oldest hand 'stencil' yet discovered

High-tech dating techniques show that prehistoric art on the walls of seven limestone caves on the Indonesian island of Sulawesi falls within the range of dates assigned to the oldest cave art in Europe.

Kinez Riza/Nature Magazine/AP
This undated handout photo provided by Nature Magazine shows stencils of hands in a cave in Indonesia. Ancient cave drawings in Indonesia are as old as famous prehistoric art in Europe, according to a new study that shows our ancestors were drawing all over the world 40,000 years ago. And it hints at an even earlier dawn of creativity in modern humans, going back to Africa, than scientists had thought.

For years, Europe has boasted the oldest examples of prehistoric cave art – a testament to the arrival of anatomically modern humans some 45,000 years ago, their budding creativity, and their ability to think symbolically.

Southeast Asia may give Europe a run for its money. For the first time, researchers have applied high-tech dating techniques to prehistoric art on the walls of seven limestone caves near the town of Maros on the Indonesian island of Sulawesi. The hand "stencils" and animal images that adorn the walls have minimum ages ranging from 35,400 to 39,900 years old. This falls within the range of dates assigned to the oldest cave art in Europe.

The oldest of the Indonesian hand stencils – the outline of a hand surrounded by red ocher – is the oldest known hand stencil yet found, according to a team of Indonesian and Australian scientists reporting the analysis in Thursday's issue of the journal Nature.

The area has long been known for its abundance of caves sporting ancient rock art, notes Wil Roebroeks, an archaeologist at the University of Leiden in the Netherlands, in an e-mail.

The abundance of cave art "by itself is a very rare phenomenon," explains Dr. Roebroeks, who didn't take part in the study. "This study now shows that part of this art is amongst the first art made anywhere in the world."

The ages raise intriguing questions, notes the research team conducting the study, led by archaeologists Maxime Aubert, with Griffith University in Queensland, and Adam Brumm, with the University of Woolongong in New South Wales.

The dates "suggest that figurative art was already part of the cultural repertoire" of the first modern humans to reach the region more than 40,000 years ago, they write.

One way to explain an itch to draw on cave walls among populations 8,000 miles apart is that the trait emerged in both groups independently – a kind of parallel cultural or cognitive development.

The alternative: The Asian and European groups carried a shared artistic tradition in different geographic directions. Their penchant for producing rock art emerged much earlier as modern humans left Africa, perhaps as early as 125,000 years ago. That would suggest additional discoveries may crop up along the migration routes these immigrants took.

Researchers have been studying the cave art near Maros since the the 1950s, notes Dr. Aubert in an e-mail. Indeed, the limestone hills, or karsts, in the area have been cited as possible additions to the United Nations Education, Cultural, and Scientific Organization's list of World Heritage Sites.

But the rates of rainy-season erosion led some people to conclude that the cave art was no older than about 8,000 years. "No one had tried to date it previously," Aubert writes, in no small part because Indonesian scientists, who have been keenly interested in the age question, didn't have the resources to do the job.

Thank "cave popcorn" for kindling new interest in figuring out how old the cave art is.

During field work at the caves in 2011, Dr. Brumm noticed that tiny nodules resembling cauliflower covered some of the hand stencils. These nodules were tiny mineral deposits that built up layer by layer as mineral-laded water percolated through the limestone during the rainy season, formed a thin film on the cave wall, then evaporated.

Naturally occurring uranium was among the elements present in the layers. As it decays, uranium-234 morphs into thorium-230. By comparing the ratio of the two isotopes in carefully extracted samples from successive popcorn layers, the team could estimate the minimum ages of the art.

The region's verdant limestone hills, rich in biodiversity as well as in evidence of prehistoric human activity, are "under severe threat from cement, marble, and phosphate mining, which threatens to quarry away large parts of this area," Roebroeks notes.

It remains to be seen if the new dates for the rock art at Maros help efforts to preserve the karsts and their record of prehistoric human activity as a World Heritage Site, designations given to several cave-art sites in Europe.

In the meantime, Aubert and colleagues are now working to find and date rock art on Borneo and New Guinea.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Indonesian cave art: oldest hand 'stencil' yet discovered
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today