What drives the monarch butterfly's 2,000-mile sojourn?

A genetic analysis of 101 North American monarchs has upended existing theories about the evolution of the iconic orange-and-black butterflies.

Courtesy of Jaap de Roode/Nature
A monarch butterfly about to emerge from its chrysalis, undated.

It’s a story nearly every grade-schooler knows: Every year, millions of monarch butterflies emerge from their chrysalises in the northern United States and southern Canada. By the time the leaves start to change color in the fall, they take to the skies in clouds of fluttering orange and black and embark on an arduous journey southward to their wintering grounds in the Oyamel fir forests in southern Mexico.

The epic journey undertaken by these North American monarchs is as remarkable as their signature orange and black stripes. None of the other monarch populations found around the world does so. So how did these delicate creatures that weigh just a fraction of a gram each come to undertake a 2,000-mile sojourn?

Until now, many scientists assumed that North American monarchs developed their migratory habits after emigrating from South America, says University of Chicago evolutionary biologist Marcus Kronforst who specializes in butterflies and genomics. That was until he and his colleagues sequenced 101 monarch genomes.

“We thought we had a very clear understanding of the history of the monarch based on what we know about other related species and what we think we know about migration in other organisms,” Professor Kronforst says.

The researchers' genetic analysis suggests that the monarch actually originated in North America as a migratory species and that the non-migratory behaviors seen in South America are the adaptation rather than the other way around. The analysis also suggests that monarchs have been migrating for much longer than previously thought.

“Prior to our work, we were thinking that migration might have evolved thousands of years ago or maybe hundreds of years ago,” Kronforst says. “Now it looks like migration in the monarch or its ancestors evolved millions of years ago.”

That doesn’t mean that monarchs have been making the same exact journey for millions of years. The original migratory path was likely much shorter, from southern US or northern Mexico to southern Mexico. It probably wasn’t until the final retreat of the glaciers about 20,000 years ago that their populations really boomed and began to expand into the northern half of North America.

With this new information, Kronforst and his colleagues now believe that the North American monarch, Danaus plexippus, and their South American counterpart, D. erippus are likely sister species descended from the same common ancestor. At the genetic level, the two species are nearly identical. Comparison of the two genomes can offer some insight into the genetics involved in migratory behavior.

However, it seems that there is more to migration than subtle differences between the two genomes, Kronforst says.

For one thing, not all North American monarchs migrate. In fact, entire generations do not. After overwintering in Mexico, the migrating monarchs begin their journey northward. These are the same individual butterflies that completed the full trek from as far north as Canada; but they are not the same individuals that return to the north and complete the migratory pattern.

"They go from southern Canada down into Mexico, spend the whole winter there and then start coming north again. It's actually the next three or four very short-lived generations that repopulate the US and get the butterflies all the way back up to southern Canada," Kronforst explains.

These short-lived offspring have the exact same genome as their parents. But somehow the 500 or so genes involved in long-range migration are expressed differently in the long-lived and short-lived generations. One significant difference in genetic expression identified by Kronforst and his colleagues results in less collagen, a stretchy connective tissue, in the wings of the long-lived generations than in the short-lived generations. The researchers suppose that the reduced quantity of collagen makes the longer-lived monarchs' muscles more efficient and therefore better equipped to spend months at a time flying southward.

The researchers published their findings in the October 2 issue of the scientific journal Nature.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to What drives the monarch butterfly's 2,000-mile sojourn?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today