Wildlife decline: Why does biodiversity matter anyway?

Half of the planet's wildlife populations suffered severe decline between 1970 and 2010, according to a new report from the WWF. So what does dwindling biodiversity mean for us?

Melanie Stetson Freeman/Staff/File
Endangered South China tiger TigerWoods walks by a stream at Laohu Valley Reserve in Philippolis, South Africa, June 21, 2006. Three South China tigers imported from China live at the reserve as part of a breeding program. Only about 60 tigers of this type are left in the world.

World Wide Fund for Nature's (WWF) latest assessment of global biodiversity is rife with grim statistics. Between 1970 and 2010, half of all vertebrate species around the globe have sharply declined. In that time, nearly 40 percent of all marine and terrestrial populations have fallen and a staggering 76 percent of freshwater species have been compromised.

But what does this steep decline in biodiversity mean for us?

For one thing, the health of wildlife populations can tell us a lot about the overall health of the globe’s ecosystems, says endangered species biologist Jon Hoekstra who serves as vice president and chief scientist for the WWF's US branch.

“They are the canary in the coal mine,” Dr. Hoekstra says. “One reason we are seeing these big declines is there is less habitat; There is less space and less ecosystem for wildlife to live. That forebodes for how well those natural ecosystems can support human life and economic activity as well.”

Forest ecosystems, for instance, not only house cuddly critters, but also provide shelter, livelihoods, water, fuel, and food for more than 2 billion people. Fisheries support more than 660 million jobs globally and supply 15 percent of the animal protein in our diets, according to the report. Economic losses resulting from continued degradation of the world’s fisheries could top $400 billion by 2050.

Today, nearly one billion people suffer from hunger; 768 million do not have access to safe, clean water. These challenges will only become more pronounced as the world’s human populations continues to swell. The latest predictions suggest that total population could top 11 billion by the end of this century.

In addition to providing humans with sustenance, natural ecosystems perform a host of additional services including including pollination, nutrient cycling and erosion control, the authors of WWF’s latest Living Planet Report write.

“Ecosystems are natural capital and we need to invest in them and not just exploit them and spend them down,” Hoekstra says. “You raise capital in order to invest in the future. We need to be doing the same thing with nature.”

One recent estimate highlighted by the researchers places the economic value of global ecosystem services at $125 trillion per year.

Biodiversity also plays a major role in the planet’s resilience in response to climate change, Hoekstra says.

“Communities and ecosystems that are more divers are more stable and more resilient to change,” Hoekstra explains. “We are going to need a world that’s resilient and there’s great evidence that biodiversity does that.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.