Can we stop the lemur from going extinct?

From ecotourism to encouraging long-term research in critical lemur sites, researchers have proposed a three-year emergency action plan to prevent the wide-eyed prosimians from going extinct. 

Julie Larsen Maher/WCS/Reuters
Ares, a baby Coquerel's Sifaka, clings to his mother's back in the Wildlife Conservation Society's Bronx Zoo Madagascar! exhibit in New York in this handout taken March 15, 2010 and released April 5, 2010. Coquerel's sifakas, one of the endangered lemurs, are found only in northwestern Madagascar where their numbers are rapidly declining due to devastating habitat loss.

Will the lemurs go the way of the dodo? 

Native only to Madagascar, more than 90 percent of the 106 known lemur species are under threat – a huge increase from 2008, when fewer than half of the species were at-risk.

In a "Policy Forum" commentary titled "Averting Lemur Extinctions amid Madagascar's Political Crisis" the journal Science, an international team of researchers have proposed a three-year emergency action plan to prevent lemurs from becoming extinct.

This renewed plan is a step to amplify the goals of a plan launched last year to increase public awareness of the grave conservation status of lemurs, Ian Colquhoun, one of the authors of the paper and an Assistant Professor of Anthropology at University of Western Ontario told the Monitor.

The primatologists proposed a total budget of $7.6 million for conservation actions in 30 priority sites in Madagascar.

Unlike continental species, lemurs tend to occupy small ecological niches. In an area inhabited by dozen lemur species, for instance, some might be fruit specialists, some would eat only leaves, and others would be active only at night, says Dr. Colquhoun

Because of this specialization, lemurs' habitats are very limited, and are becoming even more so thanks to deforestation and illegal logging. Lemurs are also routinely hunted for their meat, further threatening their existence, said researchers.

And lot of problems emanate from the political instability in the region, researchers noted in the paper.

"The creation of new protected areas has continued despite political instability brought on by the unconstitutional change of government in early 2009. However, this process has been slowed by a breakdown of government presence and control in many regions, exacerbated by suspension of funding for environmental programs by most international donors in the wake of the political crisis," according to the paper.

Madagascar is one of the poorest countries in the world, and a large part of the island has an agrarian economy consisting of mostly peasants and farmers, Colquhoun says. The challenge is to reach out to them and draw plans that could benefit them as well as the lemurs.

This is where ecotourism can come in, as lemurs represent Madagascar’s most distinctive “brand” for tourism, said researchers.

This model could be based on the ecotourism efforts underway to save mountain gorillas in Rwanda and Uganda.

It could give a boost to the economy, but there needs to be a delicate balance between boosting tourism and simultaneously preserving their habitats. A community-based approach where tourists could live with the locals and pay money to observe these rare species, Colquhoun says. "The growth cannot be sudden and exponential," he adds.

Other conservation efforts include working with local communities and encouraging long-term research – on areas such as ethnoprimatology (a study of interactions between humans and other primates) – in critical lemur sites, said researchers.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Can we stop the lemur from going extinct?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today