Yeeeehaw! Mars Rover Curiosity considering jumping sand dune.

NASA's Curiosity rover is eyeing a three-foot-tall sand dune, an ambitious climb for the SUV-sized rover. Despite the size of the climb, NASA doesn't expect the rover to actually catch air on this maneuver.

NASA's Curiosity Mars rover took this picture with its left-eye Mast Camera during the midafternoon of the mission's 526th Martian day (Jan. 28). The sand dune on the right spans a gap, called 'Dingo Gap,' between two short scarps. The dune is about 3 feet high. The nearer edge of it was about 115 feet away from Curiosity when the pictures were taken.

Will Curiosity bounce across Mars like a dune buggy?

The SUV-sized rover is considering climbing up and over a sand dune as it heads toward Mount Sharp, its long-term destination.The dune is about three feet tall, and it's steep enough to present a challenge to the SUV-sized rover. 

Despite the risks inherent in climbing the sand dune, Curiosity's drivers think this presents a better path than scrabbling across the sharp rocks on either side of the dune, which could poke holes in Curiosity's aluminum wheels.

Curiosity's wheels have taken a beating in the last few months, report NASA engineers, prompting them to pick paths a little more cautiously and check the wheels more often. This dune appears to guard a small gap, dubbed "Dingo Gap" by the Curiosity team, that could offer a smooth path to Mount Sharp and "KMS-9," another appealing science target.

"At KMS-9, we see three terrain types exposed and a relatively dust-free surface," science team collaborator Katie Stack said in a press release.

"This area is appealing because we can see terrain units unlike any that Curiosity has visited so far," says Ms. Stack, a grad student at CalTech. "One unit has striations all oriented in a similar direction. Another is smooth, without striations. We don't know yet what they are. The big draw is exploration and seeing new things."

KMS-9 is about half a mile away from Curiosity, as the Martian crow flies, but considerably farther by any of the possible routes the Curiosity team is considering.

The team spotted Dingo Gap in pictures taken from an orbiting camera, NASA's High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE).

"We'll take a peek over the dune into the valley immediately to the west to see whether the terrain looks as good as the analysis of orbital images implies," said Jim Erickson, project manager for Curiosity based at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL).

To prepare for the daunting climb up Mount Sharp, engineers have been using Curiosity's twin, left behind at JPL, to check the rover's ability to tolerate slight slippage on slopes while using its drill. With the drill bit in a rock, tests simulating slips of up to about 2 inches have not caused damage.

"These tests are building confidence for operations we are likely to use when Curiosity is on the slopes of Mount Sharp," said JPL's Daniel Limonadi, systems engineering leader for surface sampling with the rover's arm.

Other testing at JPL is evaluating possible driving techniques that might help reduce the rate of wheel punctures, such as driving backwards or using four-wheel drive instead of six-wheel drive. They are testing the theory that some wheel damage may result from the rear wheels shoving the middle or front wheels against sharp rocks, rather than simply the weight of the rover driving over the rocks.

"An analogy is when you are rolling your wheeled luggage over a curb, you can feel the difference between trying to push it over the curb or pull it over the curb," said JPL's Richard Rainen, mechanical engineering team leader for Curiosity.

Curiosity's team is planning to put in long hours, adding in some weekend and evening shifts in February, as they work to evaluate the best routes and driving techniques for Curiosity.


You can follow Liz on Twitter:

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to