DARPA Robotics Challenge opens in Florida

Seventeen of the world's most sophisticated humanoid robots will compete in eight trials in one arena. 

Tyrone Siu/Reuters
The Atlas robot is among the robots that is competing in this weekend's challenges, in a demonstration of the skills that robots will need to have to work in emergencies.

Never has turning on a hose been so dramatic.

But for the 17 humanoid robots competing in the DARPA Robotics Challenge, which began its second of three rounds this morning, it is basic tasks like this – tasks that are, of course, not so basic at all when a robot is being asked to do them – that will demonstrate these robot’s abilities to be the first responders in disaster zones too dangerous for humans.

The second round of DARPA’s competition, which will award a $2 million prize to the developers of a sophisticated robot that can operate in extreme emergencies, will run for two days at Florida’s Homestead Miami Speedway. It is open to public viewing, and it is also being broadcast live on DARPA’s website.

DARPA’s challenge was announced following the March 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster. Radiation levels had kept human responders from entering the reactor and turning a critical valve that would have vented the facilities of hydrogen, which eventually exploded and upped the level of disaster in an already disastrous situation, DARPA says. A sophisticated robot, the agency has said, could have gone into the reactor and turned the valve. But that robot, unfortunately, does not yet exist.

Enter DARPA’s competition. Over the summer, 26 robotics teams – including teams from two NASA departments – competed in the challenge’s first round, called the Virtual Robotics Challenge. In this round, teams used software of their own design to navigate a virtual robot through a computerized post-apocalyptic, suburban environment. Formidable challenges for the teams had included telling their simulated robots to turn on a garden hose.

This second round of competition is the first time that the 17 teams that moved forward are meeting in the real world. The second-round trials include eight different tasks for the robotic challengers, among them ascending an 8-foot ladder, boring a triangular hole into a concrete wall, and, in the “hardest single task,” driving a car (the really hard part is getting the robot out of the driver’s seat). The team’s robots will also once again encounter the insidious hose – this time, a real one – and will have to uncoil it and screw it into a spigot.

“Disasters are unpredictable in their manifestation and effects, so the type of robots DARPA envisions to aid in these situations must be adaptable,” writes DARPA, on the competition page. “Realism is at the heart of the DRC Trials’ tasks.”

Six of these teams are competing in Track A of the trials, designated for teams that are using robots of their own design. This group includes the Johnson Space Center’s Valkyrie robot – a big, white “superhero” robot – and the NASA Jet Propulsion Lab’s apelike RoboSimian Robot.

Track B and C teams will use their own software to operate Boston Dynamics' Atlas, a steely, 330-lb. robot that looks as if it would sooner turn on us than save us.

Track A, B, and C teams are all receiving DARPA funds to design their robots, the software to run them, or both. The second round trials also include Track D teams, which are receiving no funding from DARPA. These teams – two from the US, one from South Korea, and one from China – are using robots of their own design.

The final trial will take place next December. Competitors’ robots will have to again surmount a series of tasks but now with subpar communications between the human controllers and the robots, in expectation that a disaster zone would be cut off from normal communications networks. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to DARPA Robotics Challenge opens in Florida
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today