Why giant pandas are unusually resilient

Giant pandas, an endangered species, may be more resilient to environmental change than previously thought, scientists say. A diverse genetic pool facilitates greater immunity than some endangered species, say researches.

Jonathan Ernst/Reuters
Giant panda Tian Tian eats a frozen snack at the National Zoo Washington, DC. Researchers report that panda's have an exceptional immune system, relative to other endangered species, and may have an edge in adapting to environmental change.

The giant panda's immune system is fairly diverse, genetically speaking, suggesting the endangered species may be more resilient to environmental change than previously thought, scientists say.

Biologists estimate that only about 1,500 giant pandas live in the wild today, confined to six isolated mountain ranges in south-central China. Panda fossil remains suggest the charismatic bears once roamed through parts of Burma and northern Vietnam as well, but have since suffered from environmental change and habitat fragmentation, and have been listed as endangered by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature since 1990.

Researchers based at Zhejiang University in China who were interested in determining the genetic diversity within the dwindling wild population recently collected genetic material within either the blood, skin or fecal materials of 218 wild pandas from all six isolated mountain ranges the bears now roam. [In Photos: Giant Panda Mei Xiang Gives Birth]

The team specifically analyzed the bears' major histocompatibility complex (MHC) — the part of the genome that embodies parts of the immune system — because this is known to be an adaptive loci, meaning that different populations adapt to have different MHCs. Other parts of the genome are the same within all individuals of a given species, and would therefore not be good indicators of genetic diversity.

Animal populations need genetic diversity, because, otherwise, a single threat to the population — such as the introduction of a certain pathogen — could theoretically wipe out the entire population, if all individuals were equally prone to it.

"The assumption is that a decrease in genetic variation and a lack of exchange between isolated populations increase the likelihood of extinction by reducing the population's ability to adapt to changing environments," the team writes in a report that details their findings today (Oct. 21) in the journal BioMed Central. 

The team says the giant panda shows more diversity than several other endangered species, including the Bengal tiger and Namibian cheetah, but less diversity than the more stable brown bear.

Paul Hohenlohe, a biologist at the University of Idaho who was not involved in the study, said that this diversity suggests pandas did not experience the same type of population "bottleneck" that biologists think cheetahs experienced at some point in the animal's history; that bottleneck caused cheetahs to become more genetically uniform than many other wild animals.

The new genetic data can be used to help develop captive breeding programs that help perpetuate diversity, Hohenlohe said. 

"If you need to capture 10 pandas for a captive breeding program, then you choose those 10 to encompass the most diversity," Hohenlohe told LiveScience. "You can do that by getting them from multiple populations, or one population that has the most diversity."

Management groups can also use the new genetic data to prioritize habitat restoration projects to revolve around genetically diverse populations.

Follow Laura Poppick on TwitterFollow LiveScience on TwitterFacebook and Google+. Original article on  LiveScience.

Copyright 2013 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why giant pandas are unusually resilient
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today