Frog photobomb: NASA launches rocket, frog

A frog found itself a bit too close to the launch pad during the liftoff off NASA's LADEE spacecraft last week. The space agency says the amphibian is in 'uncertain' condition.

NASA
One frog, of unidentified species, is in “uncertain” condition after the LADEE launch last week, according to NASA. It was last seen in this photograph.

One frog, of unidentified species, is in “uncertain” condition after the LADEE launch from Virginia's Wallops Island last week, according to NASA.

The space agency reported on Wednesday that a still camera recording the LADEE spacecraft launch at Pad 0B at Wallops Flight Facility had taken “an intriguing photo of an airborne frog.”

The frog was probably enjoying a water pool that NASA scientists had put on the launchpad to protect the pad from damage, Universe Today reported. As the rocket lifted off, the amphibian was photographed shooting upward in a 2552 degrees F. (roughly) steam cloud. It has not been seen since.

NASA confirmed in a statement that the frog is not a joke: It really did launch a frog, the agency says. But NASA did not comment on whether it intended to launch the frog as part of its $263 million mission to the moon.

“The photo team confirms the frog is real and was captured in a single frame by one of the remote cameras used to photograph the launch,” NASA said in a statement.

“The condition of the frog, however, is uncertain,” it added.

The report of the frog’s one giant leap comes just four years after a bat was incinerated during a launch of space shuttle Discovery. In that episode, a fruit bat was discovered napping on the shuttle’s fuel tank just before blastoff. NASA said it hoped the bat would leave. It did not. The rocket boosters ignited.

The bat was posthumously named Brian.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.