Mayan frieze tells a tale of almost cosmic wars

Mayan frieze : A massive Mayan frieze depicts the crowing of a Mayan king – and, in its inscription, a tale of changing loyalties in an ancient feud of two kingdoms. 

Francisco Estrada-Belli/Proyecto Arqueologico Holmu/AP
Archaeologist Anya Shetler cleans an inscription below a high-relief stucco sculpture recently discovered in the Mayan city of Holmul in the northern province of Peten, Guatemala.

Archeologists have recovered a 26-foot long, and seven-foot tall frieze from a buried Mayan pyramid in Guatemala. The massive frieze, cast in stucco and painted red, depicts the crowning of a Mayan king, a find that offers a window into the epic battles between rival Mayan kingdoms and the dramas of changing fealties in the Americas more than a thousand years ago. 

The frieze depicts a king of cosmic proportions seated atop the head of a mountain god. At the sides are crouching figures holding aloft offerings. The figures’ heads are wreathed in quetzal feathers, their bodies decorated in jade.

Archaeologist Francisco Estrada-Belli, head of the team that found the artwork, told USA Today that the find is telling both for the scene itself – which offers new evidence about how Mayans anointed their kings – and for the inscription at its bottom, one that tells a tale of swapped sides in a rivalry between two powerful Mayan kingdoms.

The frieze bears at its base an inscription of 30 glyphs that Harvard University expert Alex Tokovinine has translated as a note that the artwork was commissioned, a gift of the ruler of a nearby city-state, Ajwosaj ChanK'inich.

Ajwosaj ChanK'inich was part of the Snake Kingdom, centered in Mexico; its rival kingdom was centered at Tikal, in Guatemala. The city-state where the frieze was found, called Homul, had once belonged to Tikal’s kingdom – but its rulers switched sides somewhere amid the vast battles that pocked the lead-up to the ruin of the entire Mayan civilization, around 800 AD. 

The commissioned frieze, then, is a tribute to Homul's defection and its pledging of loyalties to the Snake Kingdom.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.