India plans 2013 mission to Mars

Four years after its successful unmanned mission to the Moon, India plans to send an unmanned orbiter to the Red Planet next year. 

Indian Space Research Organization, HO/AP
Chandrayaan-1, India's maiden lunar mission, is taken to the launch pad at the Satish Dhawan Space Centre in Sriharikota, about 100 kilometers (63 miles) north of Chennai, India. The lunar orbiter launched in October 2008.

India plans to send an unmanned orbiter to Mars in November 2013 to study the climate and the geology of the Red Planet.

According to AFP, India’s Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh, has given his authorization and the final government approvals are expected at the end of this week.

"We will embark on the Mars mission after the Department of Science gives the green signal and decides the schedule early next year," Deviprasad Karnik, director of the state-run Indian Space Research Organisation told the French news agency.

A senior official at the Indian Space Research Organisation, requesting anonymity, estimated the cost of the mission at about $70 million to $90 million. The central government earmarked about $22 million for the project in the last federal budget.

In October 2008, India successfully launched its first unmanned lunar probe, Chandrayaan-1, which detected water on the Moon. According to the Indian Space Research Organisation’s website, the country is planning a second unmanned mission to the Moon, Chandrayaan-2, which will include both an orbiter and a lunar rover. 

The news comes as NASA’s Mars rover Curiosity is set to touch down on August 5. The $2.5 billion rover, the largest manmade object ever to visit another world, is designed to assess the Red Planet's habitability.

India's mission is not without its risks. As Wired points out this week, the success rate for landing on the Red Planet is only about 30 percent. So far only the Soviet Union and United States have undertaken successful missions to the Martian surface.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.