South Africa tests shark fence: An electronic 'punch' in the nose

A 100-meter-long cable was installed on Friday in a small bay in Cape Town that seeks to exploit the sharks' super-sensitive nose. Think underwater electronic dog fence. 

(AP Photo/NOAA, Greg Skomal)
A great white shark encountered off the coast of Massachusetts. A NOAA report released June 2014 says great white abundance in the area has climbed since about 2000. The scientists report the shark’s growing numbers are due to conservation efforts and greater availability of prey.

South Africa has started testing a shark repellent electronic cable in Cape Town, in a hi-tech experiment aimed at protecting swimmers without harming the deadly sea predators.

Researchers at KwaZulu-Natal Sharks Board installed a 100-meter-long cable on Friday in a small bay in Cape Town that seeks to exploit the sharks' super-sensitive nose.

The cable, fixed to the sea floor, with vertical 'risers' supporting electrodes, which emit a low-frequency, low-power electronic field that has been proven to repel sharks.

The technology has been developed by experts who invented a portable device called a "shark pod" that generates an electromagnetic field to protect scuba divers and surfers.

Research around the device shows that sharks turn away when they come across an electrical current. Sharks are sensitive around the eyes, gills and nose and some divers who routinely swim with them use small batons if they get too close.

If successful, the technology could be used around the world and also mark a major shift away from the shark nets used on the South African coastline for the past 50 years, which have been criticized as environmentally unfriendly.

"Everybody is 100 percent behind this project from the government to environmentalists, because this means we will have fewer sharks ending up dead from being trapped and tangled in the shark nets," said Paul Von Blerk, KwaZulu-Natal Sharks Board's technology specialist.

The cable, which does not provide a physical barrier to sharks or other marine animals, will remain at the Glencairn beach for five months of testing.

Researchers chose the bay because sharks appear there frequently during the summer months. Clear waters in the area will also make it easier for monitors to see whether the barrier does prove a deterrent.

Researchers said the technology would not harm humans because the cable on the seabed would be covered, while the electrodes would only produce a tingling sensation if touched.

An Austrian tourist was attacked and killed by a shark while swimming at a beach in South Africa's Eastern Cape province in March this year, while the University of Florida says sharks killed 13 people off South Africa's coastline from 2004-2013. (Reporting by Tiisetso Motsoeneng; Editing by Crispian Balmer)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.