How climate influences weather: six questions

From extreme rains in some places to early spring in others, weather events prompt questions about what role climate change may be playing.

5. For what types of weather is it hardest to identify a connection to climate change?

Andres Leighton/AP/File
Wind caused by the approaching Hurricane Earl kicks up waves and blows palm trees in San Juan, Puerto Rico, August 2010.

Even though human-caused climate change may well be a factor in hurricanes, tornadoes, and wildfires, ascribing the role with any degree of certainty in a specific event is hard. For one thing, the relative rarity of such events makes comparisons difficult.

And with wildfires as well as floods, human factors such as resource management and infrastructure add another layer of complexity. Still, wildfire experts say that as climate change pushes temperatures up and makes some regions drier, it becomes easier for a mishandled match or a lightning strike to start a blaze.

As for hurricanes and other storms, the causes are so complex that it’s difficult for models to replicate them. “The uncertainty is very high as you go down this path,” says Martin Hoerling, a research meteorologist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Earth System Research Laboratory, who specializes in climate dynamics.

Kevin Trenberth at NCAR is known as an advocate for the view that human-caused climate change has had a pervasive enough impact that it is a factor in virtually every major weather event, but not everyone agrees with him, or sees a point to talking about a role that can’t be explained with some degree of certainty. And Trenberth says it can be hard to know just what the effect will be with some of those more complex events.

“If you talk about hurricanes or tropical storms, then we expect there will be more activity with climate change, but there’s so much variety,” he says. There may be fewer but more intense storms, for example.

5 of 6

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.