Water-short Singapore charts a course toward self-sufficiency

The island nation has little water of its own but is determined to shed a reliance on water imports. One key is water recycling, alongside desalination and catchment.

Singapore National Water Agency
A view of Alexandra Canal in Singapore.

Singapore may seem like an unlikely model for the rest of the world when it comes to water management. The island nation has no natural water resources to speak of, and as a newly independent nation half a century ago it was dealing with open sewage, taps running dry in the hot season, and rationing of clean drinking water.

But now, at a time when climate change is making water security an increasingly urgent global issue, Singapore is pointing a path toward self-sufficiency.

It has become a global leader in water management and technology. It is exporting its know-how through actions like annual water conferences. And even as its  population grows, the island is on course to achieve water independence by 2060, the year before its final water import treaty with Malaysia expires.

“As a child in Singapore in the 1950s and 1960s, I lived in a typical Third World city. We had no flush toilets, some malnutrition, ethnic riots, and, most importantly of all, no sense of hope for the future,” remembers Kishore Mahbubani, dean of the Lee Kuan Yew school of public policy at the National University of Singapore.  

By contrast, Singapore today is one of Asia’s fastest-growing financial centers, and one of the world’s most densely populated cities. Its 5.4 million population is projected to reach 6.9 million by 2030, all on land about one-fourth the size of Rhode Island.

Famous for its long-term planning and forward thinking, Singapore sees water sustainability as an absolute must. Its plan centers around “Four National Taps”: imported water, water from local catchment areas, desalinated water, and reclaimed water known as NEWater.  

Imported water. When Singapore’s current agreement with Malaysia expires in 2061, future needs for imported water are expected to be virtually eliminated – along with the old worry that water could be used as political leverage by its larger neighbor to the north.

Water catchment. Singapore captures much of its heavy seasonal rainfall with built-in runoff capture systems that include drains, canals, rivers, and storm-water collection ponds. Two-thirds of Singapore’s land area is water catchment, and rainwater is collected and stored in 17 reservoirs around the island.

Desalinated water. Desalination plants – including one of Asia’s largest seawater reverse-osmosis plants – create the ability to remove excessive salt and minerals from seawater to make it drinkable. (Desalinated seawater is the costliest to produce because desalination plants use more energy, but costs go down as technology improves.)

Recycled water. NEWater, the brand name given to reclaimed water by Singapore's Public Utilities Board (PUB), is produced by further purifying treated used water with advanced membrane technologies and ultraviolet disinfection.  It exceeds drinking water standards set by the World Health Organization and the US Environmental Protection Agency.

By 2060, NEWater and desalinated water are expected to supply up to 55 percent and 25 percent, respectively, of the country’s water needs, with reservoirs and imported water supplying the rest.

A cute little mascot named Water Wally, who is shaped like a water droplet, is featured on plastic bottles of NEWater.  Water Wally is part of a wide-ranging campaign to develop community stewardship of water resources.

Singaporeans with a sense of history appreciate the steps toward water sustainability.

“The 10 months of water rationing in 1963-64 is a stark reminder for Singaporeans on the existential importance of water,” says George Madhavan of Singapore’s Public Utilities Board.

Still, some worry that younger Singaporeans show no particular zeal for water conservation.  The days without flush toilets are long forgotten. And Singaporeans seem to take for granted that clean drinking water is as far away as the nearest tap.

Public service messages about water are frequent, and “Make Every Drop Count” was the theme for Singapore World Water Day 2016.

Some analysts say the path toward more conservation may lie in behavioral economics.

Researcher Cecilia Tortajada, co-author of the 2013 book “The Singapore Water Story,” notes that the price of water has not risen since 2000, when the median employed resident household income was $4,398 and water bills represented 0.69 percent of income. By 2014, household income had increased to $8,292 and the water bill was a minuscule 0.36 percent of income.

Ms. Tortajada also says the average Singaporean uses 150 liters per day, and feels a target to reduce that to 140 liters per day by 2030 is not enough.

“Some European cities already use one-third less water compared with Singapore’s 2030 target,” she wrote in a commentary this year. 

Tortajada and book co-author Asit Biswas make the case for a “fifth tap” – higher pricing to promote water conservation – to make Singaporeans think about their personal consumption.

“What is now needed is to go to the behavioral side,” he says. “If you reduce demand by one liter, you don't have to produce that liter.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.