Why natural gas may become the fuel of choice in this coal state

In coal-loving Kentucky, Obama's climate regulations and the cheap price of natural gas are making the fossil fuel an appealing alternative to coal, writes Andy Tully.

Jim Cole/AP/File
A plume of steam billows from the coal-fired Merrimack Station in Bow, N.H.

Kentucky has long been a coal state, and as such has consistently resisted efforts by the federal government to limit greenhouse gas emissions from its coal-fired power plants.

A year ago the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued new rules, called the Clean Power Plan, designed to reduce the country's carbon emissions by 30 percent below 2005 levels by 2030. It amounted to the Obama administration’s biggest step yet to reduce emissions from power plants. It allowed states to comply using whatever power system they preferred, but it also threatens to severely curtail coal generation. (Related: The Evolution Of The Oil Weapon)

The rules, which require each state to submit a plan to the EPA, have received nothing but ire from Kentucky, which generates more than 90 percent of its electricity in coal-fired plants.

In fact, long before McCarthy announced the EPA rules, Kentucky passed legislation limiting what its own environmental agency, the Energy and Environment Cabinet, can put in its plan to be presented to Washington. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has even called for a boycott of the EPA plan. But if Kentucky doesn’t submit a plan, the EPA will impose one on the state.

However, the EPA plan merely calls for emissions reductions, without requiring electricity to be generated from a specific source. Both coal industry groups and environmentalists agree that upgrading coal plants to comply with the EPA regulations would be too costly.

Nevertheless, Kentucky may end up complying with the new rules by default. Like it or not, coal is no longer the inexpensive fuel of choice for generating electricity, thanks to the rise of extremely low-cost gas. Nationwide, coal’s share of the U.S. electricity market was 36 percent in March, down from 42 percent the same month a year ago. (Related: European Oil Companies Throw Coal Under The Bus)

Any region that produces coal is susceptible to the rise of inexpensive gas, and Appalachia is among the areas hardest hit because it is so close the Marcellus shale field, which stretches from New York state into Kentucky’s neighbor, West Virginia, Sherry Orton, an energy analyst at Doyle Trading Consultants in Grand Junction Colorado, told The Australian Financial Review.

 

The Marcellus is the most copious source of shale gas in the United States, and this shows in the price of its gas: It now costs about $1.60 per million British thermal units, about 13 percent below the cost of coal from central Appalachia.

“It’s kind of brutal across the board,” Orton said.

So natural gas is becoming the fuel of choice for generating electricity in many states, including Kentucky, in large part because of the great expense involved in upgrading existing coal-fired plants to reduce their emissions. In fact, more than one-fourth of Kentucky’s coal-fired plants have either shut down already or are expected to be shuttered within the next two years. (Related: US Shale Will Not Bounce Back At Current Prices)

These shutdowns alone mean Kentucky likely will reach the goal set by the EPA regardless of what the state’s political leadership wants. “Kentucky could be well in compliance with the targets” if it replaced the coal power with clean energy sources, Amlan Saha, a vice president at M.J. Bradley and Associates, an environmental consulting group, told Inside Climate News.

And given the price of natural gas, that seems likely.

By Andy Tully Of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Original story: http://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Natural-Gas-To-Become-Fuel-Of-Choice-In-This-Coal-State.html

Source: http://oilprice.com/

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.