UN to oil industry: You can solve climate change

Major oil and gas companies have an opportunity to lead the global fight against climate change, according to Christiana Figueres, the United Nations' climate change chief. Traditional energy firms say they are already cutting emissions, but Ms. Figueres offered both environmental and economic reasons for doing more.

Michel Euler/AP/File
UN climate chief Christiana Figueres speaks with the Associated Press at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, earlier this year. Ms. Figueres urged an audience of oil and gas industry leaders to do more on climate change Thursday – not only out of environmental concern, but also as a opportunity to invest in new technologies and growing markets.

Who is best equipped to transition the global economy to a low-carbon future? Perhaps it is those most familiar with the needs, challenges, and opportunities posed by rising human demand for energy. 

The global oil and gas industry is positioned to lead the development of a cleaner, more sustainable energy mix, Christiana Figueres, the United Nations' climate chief said in a speech Thursday. Indeed, it may have little choice, according to Ms. Figueres, as dwindling conventional energy resources threaten the industry's business model and greenhouse gas emissions destabilize climates across the globe.      

Oil and gas companies are quick to say they already contribute a great deal to lowering carbon emissions – by dramatically increasing the efficiency of resource extraction and power production, and in shifting the US away from coal and toward cleaner-burning natural gas. But Figueres urged an audience of industry leaders to do more Thursday – not only out of environmental concern, but also as an opportunity to invest in new technologies and growing markets. 

"[T]he systemic risks of unabated climate change are potentially so unmanageable that the world has no other option but to address the challenge," Figueres said, according to prepared remarks before the IPIECA (International Petroleum Industry Environmental Conservation Association) in London. "We need, and are undoubtedly moving towards, a new, sustainable energy mix. What is exciting is that the oil and gas industry can actually be part of the solution. In fact I suggest the oil and gas industry become the leaders that take us to the new, sustainable energy mix."  

Figueres called on energy producers to rein in potent methane emissions from natural gas and invest in renewable-energy technologies or ones that capture carbon emissions from existing power plants and store them underground.

First and foremost, they must be more transparent with investors about potential risks to their carbon assets, Figueres said. Those risks could come in the form of physical limits to resource extraction, the market impacts of new, emerging technologies, or taxes on carbon pollution. Three-fourths of the world's fossil fuel reserves must remain underground in order to limit global temperature rises to an agreed-upon safe level of 2 degrees C (3.6 degrees F.),Figueres said.

Activist investors have also put pressure on major energy firms to assess future threats that could leave their carbon assets "stranded" in the ground. While they have appeared increasingly receptive to shareholders' environmental concerns, most oil and gas companies continue to be skeptical of its impact on the bottom line.

ExxonMobil, the world's largest publicly traded international oil and gas company, released two reports this week that largely dismiss the risk of governments or other factors significantly curtailing its vast fossil fuel wealth.

"[W]e are confident that none of our hydrocarbon reserves are now or will become 'stranded,' " the company concluded in one of its two reports. "We believe producing these assets is essential to meeting growing energy demand worldwide, and in preventing consumers – especially those in the least developed and most vulnerable economies – from themselves becoming stranded in the global pursuit of higher living standards and greater economic opportunity."

ExxonMobil's reports came on the same day the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released its latest report in 25 years of documenting the threats posed by increased concentrations of heat-trapping gases in Earth's atmosphere. Figueres pointed to what she called the "physical boundary of the atmosphere" in making the case for game-changing support on renewables from traditional energy firms.  

"Oil and gas can preserve their legacy as enablers of growth," Figueres said. "Legacy implies solutions that persist over time. We must look past the next quarter, past the end of the decade, into the second half of the century by which time the global economy must be carbon neutral."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.