Tesla CEO says no recall necessary after Model S fires

Tesla CEO Elon Musk dismissed concerns over a third battery fire Tuesday, saying the Tesla Motors Model S electric car is among the safest cars on the road. The outspoken Tesla CEO is using his high profile to counter worries about the safety of electric car batteries.

Paul Sakuma/AP/File
Tesla CEO Elon Musk walks past the Tesla Model S after a news conference at the Tesla factory in Fremont, Calif. Mr. Musk says there's no need for a recall after three Model S electric cars caught fire after crashes in the past six weeks.

Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk is on the defensive after a series of crash-related fires have raised concerns over the safety of the company's Model S electric car. 

The concern is unnecessary, Mr. Musk says. The three fires occurring in the past six weeks were the result of freak accidents, according to the Tesla CEO, not design flaws in the Model S.

Still, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is weighing a formal investigation after the third fire took place Nov. 6 in Tennessee. The federal agency will determine whether there is any need for a recall – a notion Musk is already dismissing.

Tesla Motors has had a string of good news over the past year – winning major industry awards and earning a top safety rating from the NHTSA. The success has put a bright spotlight on Musk, which has helped boost the profile of Tesla Motors and electric cars in general. So far, the Tesla CEO isn't shying away from that spotlight when the news isn't so great. 

"There's no reason for a recall," Mr. Musk said during a conference Tuesday hosted by The New York Times Dealbook blog. "If you read the headlines, it sounds like Teslas have a greater propensity to catch fires than other cars. In reality, nothing could be further from the truth."

Public perception plays a large role in attitudes toward electric cars, and Americans have been slow to embrace the technology, particularly after spontaneous battery fires plagued earlier generations of electric cars.

It's not surprising, then, that Musk has been outspoken on the issue. The Tesla chief executive officer is extroverted even by the standards of the modern CEO. He has an avid Twitter following and often responds to potential controversies with detailed blog posts he writes himself. In February, when a New York Times writer wrote a review of the Model S that he found objectionable, he took to the Tesla blog to offer a contrary narrative. 

He's using a similar approach in response to the recent fires. After the first incident, he posted an account on the Tesla blog and calculated that drivers are five times more likely to experience a car fire in a conventional gasoline car than in a Tesla. Since then, two additional fires have occurred, but Musk insists the car is among the safest on the road.

After the latest fire, the company posted an account of the incident from the driver of the Model S that was punctured by a rusty three-pronged trailer hitch.

"I am thankful to God that I was totally uninjured in any way from this impact," writes Juris Shibayama on Tesla's blog. "Had I not been in a Tesla, that object could have punched through the floor and caused me serious harm."  

After he drove over the detached trailer hitch on an interstate highway, the Model S issued visual warnings, asking him to pull over, according to Mr. Shibayama. He was able to exit the car before it caught fire. He was unharmed.

"This experience does not in any way make me think that the Tesla Model S is an unsafe car," Shibayama wrote. "I would buy another one in a heartbeat."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Tesla CEO says no recall necessary after Model S fires
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today