Obama Boston speech interrupted by Keystone XL protesters

Keystone XL protesters used President Obama's Wednesday speech on health care to put the Canada-Texas pipeline back in the spotlight. Attention has shifted away from Keystone XL in recent months as fiscal debates and health care have overshadowed climate change in Washington.

Charles Dharapak/AP
President Obama speaks at Boston's historic Faneuil Hall about the federal health care law, Wednesday. Mr. Obama's speech was interrupted by Keystone XL pipeline protesters.

Critics of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline interrupted President Obama's speech on health care in Boston Wednesday, demanding that he reject the controversial pipeline.

Keystone XL has emerged as a touchstone in the climate change debate since the pipeline was first proposed more than five years ago. But the topic is regularly sidelined by the news of the day – particularly in recent months as government shutdowns and debates over health care have dominated headlines.

Activists used Wednesday's forum as an opportunity to put the Canada-Texas pipeline back in the spotlight, interrupting his speech twice, but it's unclear what kind of lingering effect such a stunt might have on either the president's or the public's view on the proposed pipeline.

"Stop the Keystone pipeline," the protesters chanted from the aisles of Faneuil Hall, as the president defended the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The health-care program has come under scrutiny for technical problems relating to its website, among other issues in its bumpy rollout.

Mr. Obama smiled and paused to allow the protesters to finish. 

"That is the wrong rally. We had the climate change rally back in the summer," he quipped after the first interruption, perhaps referring to a large demonstration in Washington that drew tens of thousands to the National Mall in February. "This is the health-care rally." Once the protesting subsided, he resumed his speech.

It's perhaps a sign of frustration from environmentalists who have been petitioning Obama to reject the presidential permit required to build the transnational pipeline, which would transport heavy crude oil from Canadian tar sands to refineries in Texas. Opponents say the pipeline would increase US carbon emissions and poses the risk of oil spills.

Obama has been relatively mum on the subject, save during his June speech on climate change in which he said he'd only approve the pipeline if it did not significantly increase carbon emissions. 

Backers of the pipeline have also expressed frustration with the permitting process, which has involved a handful of controversial government environmental reviews and is expected to continue at least into 2014. But TransCanada, the Canadian energy company behind the project, hasn't shown any signs of backing down from building the pipeline, or finding alternative ways to get the oil to market.

“I think it’s clear that, [for] producers in both Canada and the United States, that the production decision is driven off ... global oil prices, not off pipeline infrastructure," TransCanada chief executive Russ Girling said Wednesday in an interview with The Hill. "As long as global prices support the development of the resource, it is going to get developed, and then it is going to get to market one way or another.”

Nearly two-thirds of Americans support the Keystone XL pipeline, according to a September poll by the Pew Research Center. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Obama Boston speech interrupted by Keystone XL protesters
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today