Americans taken from oil ship near Nigeria. Why pirates are moving west.

Two US citizens were kidnapped from an oil supply vessel off the coast of Nigeria. The incident highlights piracy's shift westward from East Africa – tighter security and the promise of new oil have made the continent's western coast an increasing target for pirate attacks.

Thierry Gouegnon/Reuters/File
An Ivory Coast gendarmerie boat is seen at the port of Abidjan. Pirates attacked an oil supply ship off the west coast of Africa Wednesday, kidnapping two US sailors.

Pirates kidnapped two US citizens from an oil supply vessel off the coast of Nigeria early Wednesday, officials told Reuters. The State Department and FBI were leading the American response to the incident, which resulted in the kidnapping of the ship's captain and chief engineer.

Piracy has long flourished off Africa's east coast, where lawlessness in Somalia has fueled attacks on large vessels carrying fuels and other goods. But the intervention of international naval forces is forcing pirates west, where a combination of looser security and increased oil production makes the region an appealing target. 

“There has been a worrying trend in the kidnapping of crew from vessels well outside the territorial limits of coastal states in the Gulf of Guinea,” said Pottengal Mukundan, director of the International Maritime Bureau (IMB), an arm of the International Chamber of Commerce, said in a July statement announcing the organization's global piracy report. 

"There continues to be significant under-reporting of attacks," Mr. Mukundan said. "This prevents meaningful response by the authorities and endangers other vessels sailing into the area unaware of the precise nature of the threat.”       

East African attacks are down, following the global downward trend in piracy. Only 75 ships reported attacks off the coast of Somalia and in the Gulf of Aden in 2012, according to IMB. That's down from 237 in 2011, a figure that accounted for a quarter of attacks worldwide. But West African attacks ticked up to 58 in 2012 from 33 in 2010. In the first half of 2013, IMB reported 31 incidents in the Gulf of Guinea.

The attraction is Nigeria, which is Africa's largest oil producer with a capacity of over 3 million barrels of oil per day. In 2011, Nigeria was the fourth-largest foreign oil supplier to the US. Theft and vandalism have hit onshore production hard in recent years, with the country losing $11 billion to crude oil theft and pipeline vandalism between 2009 and 2011. Citing instability in Nigeria, oil major Shell's Profit dropped to $4.6 billion in the second quarter 2013 from $5.7 billion a year earlier. 

Wednesday's attack, along with other recent incidents. suggests attacks are increasingly moving offshore. That trend has troubled west African leaders, who in June called for the establishment of an international naval force in the Gulf of Guinea to cut down on security threats. Naval ships from European Union, China and the US already patrol the waters off Somalia on Africa's east coast.

“The weakness – and sometimes general inadequacy – of maritime policies in Gulf of Guinea states, and the lack of cooperation between them have allowed criminal networks to diversify their activities and gradually extend them away from the coast and out on the high seas, from the Niger delta to Côte d’Ivoire”, Thierry Vircoulon, central Africa project director of International Crisis Group, said in a statement announcing the Brussels-based nonprofit's report on the area last December.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Americans taken from oil ship near Nigeria. Why pirates are moving west.
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today