Government shutdown forces 90 percent staff cut at nuclear regulator. Don't panic.

On-site inspectors will remain on the job at nation's 100 commercial reactors, despite the Nuclear Regulatory Commission implementing its government shutdown plan. The agency had been able to skirt the government shutdown by using carryover funds, but now those funds have run dry.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission/AP/File
Allison Macfarlane, second from right, chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, gets a tour of the now-closed San Onofre Nuclear Power Station in San Juan Capistrano, Calif., in January. The NRC announced Wednesday it would begin implementing its government shutdown plan.

Having exhausted carryover funds that kept it open during the government shutdown, the federal agency responsible for regulating the nation’s 100 commercial nuclear reactors began furloughing more than 90 percent of its staff Thursday.

There's no short-term threat to public safety, officials at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and other analysts said. On-site inspectors will remain on the job and employees will be called out of furlough in the case of an emergency.

But non-emergency reactor licensing, emergency preparedness exercises, and inspection of nuclear materials are among the day-to-day operations put on hold amid the lapse in appropriations. The cutback significantly crimps the agency's ability to lend oversight and planning for a nuclear industry already troubled by cheap energy competitors and waning electricity demand.

"We are mindful of the impact the shutdown will have on the public, our licensees, our staff and contractors and others who count on us," NRC Chairman  Allison Macfarlane wrote in a post announcing the furloughs on the agency's website Wednesday. 

The cuts leave about 300 of the agency’s 3,900 employees, roughly half of whom are the on-site inspectors that oversee operations at nuclear reactors. The other half make up emergency personnel. The presidentially-appointed chairman, NRC commissioners, and inspector general are also exempted from the furloughs.

"The government shutdown is not good for the NRC," Dale Klein, a former NRC chair and now associate vice chancellor for research at The University of Texas System, wrote in an e-mail. "[B]ut I expect the NRC to maintain critical staff positions and they would immediately call back most workers if there was a serious event."

Private industry is also equipped to respond to any kind of emergency situation, said Scott Peterson, senior vice president of the Nuclear Energy Institute, an industry advocacy group.

"From a safety, security, and operational oversight perspective, there will be no change at all," Mr. Peterson said.

The NRC was among other energy agencies – including the Department of Energy (DOE) and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) – that were operating at full capacity during the shutdown by using carryover funds. DOE and FERC continue to use those funds, but officials have said they will have to implement furloughs eventually.   

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.