Keystone XL pipeline approved by governor, now in Obama's hands

Keystone XL pipeline construction was given the go-ahead Tuesday by Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman. The approval comes after the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality concluded the Keystone XL pipeline's new proposed route would have "minimal environmental impacts." 

AP Photo/Nati Harnik/AP/File
Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman addresses an audience in Lincoln, Neb., in this November 2012 file photo. Heineman's approval of a new route for the Keystone XL pipeline removes a significant obstacle in the path towards realizing the project.

The governor who helped block a permit for the Keystone XL pipeline now says he's supports the project.

Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman gave a green light Tuesday to a revised route for the pipeline, which would carry Canadian oil to refineries around Houston, Texas. The decision removes a significant obstacle in the path towards realizing the controversial project.

President Barack Obama, fresh off an inaugural address calling for bold action on climate change, will have the final say. He is expected to announce a decision sometime in early 2013.

Mr. Heineman's stance, expressed in a letter to the president and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, marks a change of heart for the governor.

In 2011, Heineman asked President Barack Obama to reject a permit for the pipeline, saying it would threaten a vital water source. The initial plan called for the pipeline to cross substantial areas of the Ogallala Aquifer, a vast, shallow, underground water supply that the governor called "the lifeblood of Nebraska’s agriculture industry."

Heineman called for the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality to study a new route proposed for the pipeline. Earlier this month, that study concluded the construction and operation of the pipeline would result in "minimal environmental impacts."  

The new route still crosses the Ogallala Aquifer, but bypasses Nebraska's fragile Sand Hills, according to the report. The impacts of any oil release "should be localized and Keystone would be responsible for any cleanup," the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality report found. 

Construction of the pipeline would provide a $418.1 million economic boost, according to the report.

In his letter of approval Tuesday, Heineman cited the study's results as impetus for backing the project.

TransCanada, the company behind the project, welcomed the governor's announcement.

"[T]oday’s approval of the Nebraska re-route by Governor Heineman moves us one step closer to Americans receiving the benefits of Keystone XL – the enhanced energy security it will provide and the thousands of jobs it will create," Russ Girling, TransCanada’s president and chief executive officer, said in a statement.

In his second inaugural address Monday, President Obama made a bold endorsement for clean energy, making no mention of oil, gas or the "all-of-the-above" approach to energy he has touted in the past. Environmentalists embraced the message, saying that blocking the Keystone XL pipeline would help fulfill his goal of slowing climate change.

"[E]ven if the President is sincere in every syllable, he's going to need lots of backup to help him get his point across in a city dominated by fossil fuel interests," wrote Bill McKibben, founder of the environmental campaign 350.org, in a blog post Monday. "If you're serious about protecting future generations from climate change," he added in a message aimed at the president, "stop the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline."

Before making a final decision, President Obama will also review an analysis of the proposed pipeline by the US State Department, expected in the coming days or weeks. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.