Expiring tax credits threaten wind industry jobs

Thousands of wind industry jobs are at risk if government tax credits are not renewed, according to Consumer Energy Report.

Marion Owen/Kodiak Daily Mirror/AP/File
Muhammed Oladineji, left, and Orlando Muentes with Wind Energy Services paint the leading edges of 280 foot-tall wind turbine in Kodiak, Alaska in this September 2012 file photo. Expiring tax credits may mean a reduction in wind industry jobs, according to Consumer Energy Report.

With a nearly $1 billion government tax credit for the industry in doubt, the wind energy sector in the United States is on the brink of elimination, putting both thousands of jobs and the goal of promoting sustainable energy at risk.

In existence since 2008, the tax credit is aimed at helping startups in the wind energy industry to get on their feet, allowing them access to the funds that they need to be successful in the face of stiff competition from both other energy sources and undercutting by their Chinese counterparts. Those challenges have seen about 10,000 jobs disappear in the past four years as wind energy companies shrink in order to survive, making the potential elimination of the tax credit when it comes up for renewal again on December 31, 2012 a crisis-level concern for those invested in the industry. (See also: Do Government Subsidies Ever Pay Off?)

The concerns stem from the polarized positions that the two presidential candidates have taken, with Barack Obama supporting the continuation of the credit and Mitt Romney promising to abolish it. While the wind energy sector holds its breath leading up to the election on November 6, opponents of the tax credit are hard at work lobbying for its removal.

“Big Wind has had extension after extension after extension,” said Benjamin Cole, spokesperson for the partly oil-financed American Energy Alliance, a group that has been actively lobbying against the tax credit. “The government shouldn’t be continuing to prop up industries that never seem to be able to get off their training wheels.”

An announcement from wind turbine manufacturer Gamesa earlier this month revealing that 92 of its 115 workers had been laid off was followed by news this week that German-based turbine company Siemens would layoff 945 of its American employees, putting intense pressure on the debate while dashing some of the remaining hope held by those waiting for a call to come back to work. (See also: Wind Power Continues Trend of Rapid Growth in U.S.)

“We are all really sad,” said Miguel Orobiyi, a mechanical assembler at the Gamesa plant for almost five years before being laid off earlier this year. “I hope they call us back because they are really, really good jobs.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.