House passes 'No More Solyndras Act'

House Republicans passed a bill that would require the US Treasury to review loans given through the energy sector stimulus funds. The move is an effort to call attention to bad investments made through the stimulus program, according to Consumer Energy Report.

Robert Galbraith/Reuters/File
A sign at the entrance to the headquarters of bankrupt Solyndra LLC is shown in Fremont, Calif., in this September 2011 file photo. Republicans pushed a bill through the House that would eliminate ongoing federal loan guarantees like the $500 million given to Solyndra.

The Republican Party pushed a bill through the House that would eliminate ongoing federal loan guarantees that exist as a part of President Barack Obama’s economic stimulus package, enacted shortly after he assumed office in 2009. While the bill has no hope of successfully passing through the Democrat-rich Senate, it does stand to highlight one of the major shortcomings in Obama’s presidency mere months before he attempts to earn a second term in office.

Passing on a mainly party-line vote at 245-161, the bill would require the United States Treasury to review and approve any further loans given through the energy sector stimulus funds while reiterating the law that forbids subordinating loans, allowing for private investors to be repaid before the government.

Dubbed the “No More Solyndras Act,” the move by Republicans is an effort to bring public notice to the taxpayer money lost in bad investments through the stimulus program, particularly the $500 million given to solar power company Solyndra LLC, a firm that went bankrupt in the face of Chinese competition soon after receiving its government loan.

“I’m stunned by the cavalier manner in which the administration squandered all of these tax dollars,” said Republican Rep. Fred Upton of Michigan, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, “yet says it has no regrets, no apologies, about its handling of the program. Burning money is one source of energy that the country doesn’t need.”

Members of the Democratic Party have dismissed the vote as partisan and not useful to the debate over stimulus funds, adding that the Republican claim that the Solyndra loan was made for political reasons remains unproven.

“It’s clear that this legislation is a political exercise,” said Democratic Rep. Diana DeGette of Colorado. “It does nothing but attempt to keep the word ‘Solyndra’ in the news.”

Source: House Votes to Stop Energy Loans

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.