California oil spill: Improved odds for animals caught in crude

Courtesy of Brittani Peterson/CALOES
The eared grebe immediately takes flight while the ruddy duck swims off after being released from the hands of an Oiled Wildlife Care Network representative, Oct. 13, 2021, in Seabridge Park, Huntington Beach, California.

Two ways to read the story

  • Quick Read
  • Deep Read ( 6 Min. )

An Oct. 2 oil spill off the coast of California has turned out to be much less damaging than experts initially anticipated. Estimates of oil released from a torn underwater pipeline owned by Amplify Energy have been revised downward, from potentially 144,000 gallons to 25,000, according to the U.S. Coast Guard. Beaches have reopened, aided by crews picking up tar balls and by ocean currents, wind, and wave action. 

Michael Ziccardi runs the Oiled Wildlife Care Network, which is tasked with coordinating oiled wildlife response to the spill. He and his team released the first affected birds back into the wildlife last week. The release is a testament to the increased rate of wildlife survival after such incidents, generally a 50% to 75% success rate for treated, captured animals until the time of their release, up from a 25% to 50% rate in the early 1990s, he says.

Why We Wrote This

Faster response times and dedicated resources are improving the odds for wildlife caught up in environmental disasters. We take a look behind the scenes to see what’s led to this progress.

Dr. Ziccardi attributes much of the progress to readiness. “The level of preparedness now, versus 20 years ago, is tremendous.”

Some experts argue euthanasia may be more humane than cleaning and releasing oiled birds. But Dr. Ziccardi believes “data shows that it does make a difference.”

It was a joyous occasion. On Oct. 13, two birds – a ruddy duck and an eared grebe – were the first to be released after being rescued from an oil spill in the coastal waters of Southern California. Set free at a small beach in placid Huntington Harbor, the recovered grebe, once heavily oiled, immediately took flight. The duck, also formerly coated with crude, paddled and bobbed, oblivious to crouching photographers and television cameras on shore. 

The first planned release of recovered wildlife is “like a turning point” in an oil spill, says Michael Ziccardi, director of the Oiled Wildlife Care Network, which is tasked with coordinating oiled wildlife response to the Oct. 2 spill. The release is also a testament to the increased rate of wildlife survival after such incidents, generally a 50% to 75% success rate for treated, captured animals until the time of their release, up from a 25% to 50% rate in the early 1990s, he says. He attributes much of the progress to readiness. “The level of preparedness now, versus 20 years ago, is tremendous.”

On the morning of the release, Dr. Ziccardi, a veterinarian, and Laird Henkel, a senior environmental scientist in the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Office of Spill Prevention and Response, sat down with the Monitor to talk about the improvement in the survivability of animals recovered from oil spills. Mr. Henkel directed the wildlife response for this event. The two are relieved that the leak is not as bad as first feared. Estimates of oil released from a torn underwater pipeline owned by Amplify Energy have been revised downward, from potentially 144,000 gallons to 25,000, according to the U.S. Coast Guard. Beaches have reopened, aided by crews picking up tar balls and by ocean currents, wind, and wave action. 

Why We Wrote This

Faster response times and dedicated resources are improving the odds for wildlife caught up in environmental disasters. We take a look behind the scenes to see what’s led to this progress.

“We all feel very fortunate that it appears that the overall abundance of wildlife out there on the ocean and on the beaches was really low,” Mr. Henkel says, noting that it was neither breeding nor migration season. Only 111 wildlife were collected from the three affected counties – Los Angeles, Orange, and San Diego – the vast majority of them birds. Of the birds collected, 74 were dead, but 32 were alive – including 7 snowy plovers, a threatened species of small shorebird. As of Monday, 10 birds had been released.

The extent of the damage was unknown when Mr. Henkel first got the call about the spill midday on Oct. 2, a Saturday. But because protocols, a response network, and care facilities were already in place, teams could be activated quickly and forcefully. Four regional facilities were put on standby – two for birds and two for mammals – with one for each group serving as a “MASH” unit for immediate stabilization before transport to a primary care facility. Vehicles and personnel began rolling at 4 a.m. Sunday from the University of California, Davis, where Dr. Ziccardi’s office is based in the veterinary school. By first light Sunday, two teams from the Los Angeles Oiled Bird Care and Education Center were on the scene. The facility, near the Port of Los Angeles in San Pedro, is the primary care center for the birds from this spill – one of 12 facilities up and down the state designated for care of oiled wildlife.

Francine Kiefer/The Christian Science Monitor
Dr. Michael Ziccardi (left) and Laird Henkel (right) at Orange Coast College in Costa Mesa, California, on Oct. 13, 2021. The college is the site of the unified command for response to the Oct. 2 oil spill off Huntington Beach. Mr. Henkel, senior scientist for California's Office of Spill Prevention and Response, directed the wildlife response effort, and Dr. Ziccardi, a veterinarian and director of the Oiled Wildlife Care Network, is coordinating the response.

So far, no marine mammals have been collected for treatment from this spill. Unlike furry sea otters, which don’t live this far south, other marine mammals are less susceptible than birds, though cetaceans like whales and dolphins can breathe in harmful vapors from oil, says Mr. Henkel. 

On the other hand, oil interferes with a bird’s alignment of feathers that allows them to stay afloat, dry, and warm. It weighs them down and weakens them as they expend more energy to move and maintain their body temperature. They seek warmth by beaching themselves, but then they lose their access to food. At the Los Angeles bird care center, they are cleaned with a solvent, dish soap, and warm water. Dr. Ziccardi says the more recent practice of bringing oiled wildlife first to a “MASH” station to get warm, hydrated, and have a little more time has made a big difference. 

“We’ve actually got reports from our facility people with the birds coming in to them. They say that they’re in amazing shape when they arrive, just because of the care they’re getting early.” 

It wasn’t always this way. The two men explain that the massive Exxon Valdez oil tanker spill in Alaska’s Prince William Sound in 1989 and the 1990 American Trader oil tanker spill off Huntington Beach – the same area as this spill – triggered a major shift in attitude in industry and government, spurred on by public opinion.

Congress quickly moved to pass the U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990, which mandates that wildlife protection and rehabilitation be part of oil spill contingency plans. But the California Legislature went much further that year, setting up a detailed framework for response, including facilities for oiled wildlife care. This led to the 1994 founding of Dr. Ziccardi’s Oiled Wildlife Care Network, which draws on help from 1,600 trained volunteers and 44 member organizations to help in California oil spills. “In California, public opinion after those big spills in ’89 and ’90 really helped,” says Mr. Henkel.

No other state comes even close to California’s systematic approach and its dozen facilities, says Dr. Ziccardi, who worked on the 2010 Deep Water Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico for five months. Texas has one purpose-built facility for oiled wildlife, and Delaware has one, he says. “That is it.” 

Dr. Ziccardi chairs the Global Oil Wildlife Response System, a consortium of 11 leading wildlife groups that do worldwide response. And Europe has pulled together groups in several countries to come up with standardized protocols and training. “But it would be hard to argue the fact that California is the best-prepared place in the world for spill response,” he says.

Courtesy of Petty Officer 3rd Class Alex Gray/U.S. Coast Guard
Contractors deploy booms at Batiquitos Lagoon in Carlsbad, California, Oct 10, 2021, ahead of inclement weather, to protect an environmentally sensitive area. The crews worked alongside federal, state, and local partners, ensuring cleanup efforts were conducted efficiently and with minimal impact on the environment.

Triage for oiled animals has its critics in the scientific community. As the world focused on the Deepwater disaster, for instance, German biologist Silvia Gauss argued it was kinder and made more sense to euthanize oiled birds than to clean and release them. She said studies of oiled birds after they are released show midterm survival is less than 1%. In addition to long-term health risks, the stress of being caught and cleaned can be fatal, she said.  

But in a 2018 article in the Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management, Mr. Henkel and Dr. Ziccardi argue otherwise. They point to variability among studies, and write that post-release survival can “far exceed” lower results that compare released oiled birds with control groups of non-oiled birds. In studies of penguins and pelicans, there was no difference, they write. 

After the 1990 American Trader oil spill, a post-release study of brown pelicans funded by Dr. Ziccardi’s group found significant mortality. But after the Refugio oil spill in Santa Barbara County 25 years later, and using better tracking technology, Dr. Ziccardi says there was no statistical difference in survivability between oiled brown pelicans that were treated and released and a control group of non-oiled brown pelicans. 

In the interview, Dr. Ziccardi explains that survival data is “a little messy.” Much depends on the type of oil spill, the speed of response, and the kind of bird – whether it is a robust species or not. Seven of the 32 recovered birds in this spill have had to be euthanized, and two died in care – still a short-term survivability rate of 72%. Dr. Ziccardi says he wants to continue to learn from each spill and improve procedures. Some people may think oiled wildlife recovery is not worthwhile, he says, but “data shows that it does make a difference.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.