US firefighters turn to AI to battle the blazes

As wildfires continue to burn across the Western United States, firefighters are using data analytics to aid in fighting the flames. Statistical models predict how fires spread, which helps make sure firefighters are deployed to where they are most needed. 

Noah Berger/AP
Firefighters battle the Sugar Fire, part of the Beckwourth Complex Fire, in Plumas National Forest, California, on July 8, 2021. Fire manager Brad Pietruszka says statistical models reduce uncertainty and help firefighters make better decisions.

Last summer, as Will Harling captained a fire engine trying to control a wildfire that had burst out of northern California’s Klamath National Forest, overrun a firebreak, and raced towards his hometown, he got a frustrating email.

It was a statistical analysis from Oregon State University forestry researcher Chris Dunn, predicting that the spot where firefighters had built the firebreak, on top of a ridge a few miles out of town, had only a 10% chance of stopping the blaze.

“They had spent so many resources building that useless break,” said Mr. Harling, who directs the Mid Klamath Watershed Council, and works as a wildland firefighter for the local Karuk Tribe.

“The index showed it had no chance,” he told the Thomson Reuters Foundation in a phone interview.

The Suppression Difficulty Index (SDI) is one of a number of analytical tools Mr. Dunn and other firefighting technology experts are building to bring the latest in machine learning, big data, and forecasting to the world of firefighting.

As climate change and gaps in forest management create more intense and deadly wildfire seasons, firefighting resources are increasingly stretched to the limit.

Researchers like Mr. Dunn hope their tools can help ease that pressure by making sure scarce fire resources are deployed as efficiently as possible.

Mr. Dunn said so far firefighters at half of national forests are using one popular analytical tool he helped develop called Potential Operational Delineations (PODs).

It combines local firefighter know-how with advanced spatial analytics to help teams plan where to take on a fire even before it breaks out.

The tool superimposes a number of statistical models – such as the SDI – over a map of a region so fire managers and communities can plan out their control lines and plans of attack in advance.

“You will never take the personal element out of fighting fires,” said Brad Pietruszka, a fire manager at the 1.8-million-acre San Juan National Forest who has been using advanced analytical tools like PODs since 2017.

“But people make bad decisions under stress – they can’t crunch all this data on their own. This is about reducing the uncertainty, and helping firefighters make better decisions.”

Data hungry

For decades, firefighters have relied on analytics to predict the possible behavior of fires, pulling on a range of data from weather patterns to satellite footage of potential fire fuels and historical fire behavior.

Now advances in computing and artificial intelligence (AI) mean they can increasingly lean on predictive technologies to supercharge their own insights.

“When I was first asked if we could use artificial intelligence to fight fires, I said, ‘No way. There’s too much uncertainty,’” recalled David Calkin, a longtime U.S. Forest Service (USFS) researcher.

“But then I thought: ‘What if we did plan a research agenda to head in that direction?’”

Combining machine learning with years of research, fire analysts like Mr. Calkin and Mr. Dunn build models that add layers of data on top of the institutional knowledge of local firefighting crews, explained Rick Stratton, a fire analyst at the USFS.

“Firefighters only see so much, their careers are short – but now we can model thousands of artificial seasons and pull all sorts of insights,” said Mr. Stratton, who runs an online dashboard that lets fire managers see analytics of their terrain in real-time.

“We wouldn’t have been able to do that 15 years ago. We didn’t have the computer power.”

One of the most complex tools developed by researchers in recent years is the Potential Control Locations (PCL) algorithm, which uses machine learning to suggest where firefighters should place their control lines during a blaze.

“It’s very data hungry,” Mr. Dunn explained. “It takes into account distances from roads, where there are ridges and flat ground, what kind of fuel is present on the ground, and it samples historical fire perimeters, too.”

Armed with an alphabet soup of analytic tools – PCLs, SDI, PODs, and others – firefighters are getting crucial help deciding where to direct their efforts during increasingly out-of-control fire seasons, Mr. Pietruszka said.

“More and more we’re seeing multiple regions with large fires and the competition for firefighting resources is really extreme – there just aren’t enough people,” he said.

“We need to know what to do with our limited resources – that’s the promise of these tools.”

Man and the machine

Mr. Dunn and the other experts stress that these models work best when coupled with human insights – and when people living in wildfire-prone areas understand the process.

One of the exercises they encourage communities to do before fire season is to map local priorities, said Mr. Dunn.

That includes deciding which locations must be defended from fire at all costs and which areas can be exposed to the blaze to help thin out the landscape to make sure future fires are less intense.

Chris Chambers, a fire chief in Ashland, Oregon, has seen how that plays out on the ground.

He has spent recent months mapping the grass and dry brush around the city and putting that data into Mr. Dunn’s models, which in turn have helped him identify areas for controlled burns, where to build defenses, and where to deploy resources when fire ignites.

“In the past, I just would print out a map and write down all the places I wanted to try and remove fuel,” he said.

Mr. Chambers plans to distribute detailed maps showing the different indexes to the temporary firefighting crews that arrive every wildfire season.

As this year’s fire season flares in the western United States, Mr. Calkin, the USFS researcher, is charging ahead with his research agenda, hoping to produce insights on everything from where planes should drop fire retardant to how hotshot crews – elite firefighting units – spread out during a blaze.

Still, he is concerned about the long-term viability of these tactics.

“The Catch-22 is, when you model, all you have is historic data,” he said. “And as climate change creates a novel future, it can become more and more difficult to model what you don’t know.”

This story was reported by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.