How other nations are urging President Trump to stay in the Paris agreement

Some delegates just want the US to remain at the table, even if it means the nation scales back its pledge to cut back on emissions. 

Martin Meissner/AP/File
Giant machines dig for brown coal at the open-cast mining Garzweiler in front of a smoking power plant near the city of Grevenbroich in western Germany. Despite uncertainties about whether the United States will remain committed to the Paris climate accord under President Donald Trump, diplomats convened talks in Bonn, Germany, Monday, May 8, 2017.

Many nations urged US President Trump on Monday to remain in the global agreement to combat climate change, even if he reduces the ambition of US pledges to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

Mr. Trump's main advisers are due to meet on Tuesday to review his threat to quit the 2015 Paris Agreement to limit global warming, that is backed by governments as diverse as China, OPEC oil producers and the poorest African states.

At United Nations negotiations that began on Monday in the German city of Bonn, the chairman of the talks, Moroccan Foreign Minister Salaheddine Mezouar, said global momentum to combat climate change was irreversible and it would be "difficult or foolish" for anyone to defy public pressure for action.

At the talks, which run until May 18, almost 200 nations will try to work out detailed rules for the agreement. Delegates called on countries to implement their pledges to cut emissions.

When asked about the US position, Yvon Slingenberg, head of the European Commission's delegation, told a news conference: "We do consider that it would be quite important (for the US) to stay at the table," even with Trump's pro-coal policies.

Trump's advisers have warned of legal problems if Washington stays in the Paris deal but waters down former president Barack Obama's goal of deep cuts in emissions by 2025.

The Paris Agreement's Article 4 says any nation can adjust its goals at any time "with a view to enhancing its ambition."

It does not mention an option of reducing ambition and some US legal experts argue that the wording makes it impossible for Trump to stay in the agreement and carry out his promises to promote the high-emitting US coal industry.

But many delegates say the accord is vague enough to let nations scale back ambitions if needed, perhaps because of future economic recessions or natural disasters.

Patricia Espinosa, the UN's climate chief, told an online news conference that the spirit of the Paris Agreement was for all nations to set ever more ambitious targets.

"Having said that, it is important to acknowledge that parties may at different moments face some specific situations that they may wish to address," she added.

The US delegation in Bonn is unusually small with just seven officials – fewer, for instance, than the number sent by nations such as Algeria or Zimbabwe.

In Washington, some powerful US conservatives reaffirmed opposition to the Paris deal.

"Remaining in the Paris Climate Treaty would undermine the Trump administration's efforts to protect American families from unnecessary and burdensome climate regulations," said Thomas Pyle, president of the American Energy Alliance, who served on Trump's transition team. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to How other nations are urging President Trump to stay in the Paris agreement
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today