Workers begin clearing Oroville spillway debris as officials plan for the future

California water authorities shut off the flow of water down a damaged spillway Monday so that workers could begin clearing debris off of it.

This image provided by KCRA shows Oroville Dam's severely damaged spillway in Oroville, Calif. on Monday.

Workers in California began removing debris from a damaged emergency spillway at the Oroville Dam on Monday, in the first step toward resolving an emergency that led officials to evacuate some 200,000 residents from areas downstream on Feb. 12.

Water authorities closed off the release of water from the spillway on Monday. They expect that workers can clear between 500,000 and 1 million cubic yards of debris over the next five to seven days, Department of Water Resources spokeswoman Lauren Bisnett told the Associated Press.

Clearing the debris should help return the Hyatt Power Plant, which manages water levels in the dam’s reservoir, to operation in time for spring runoff, Butte County Sheriff Kenneth Honea said.

"We're in it for the long haul and I've asked the public to be aware of that and be patient as we go forward," Mr. Honea told the AP.

Even as officials cautioned that the emergency had not yet been fully resolved, others were already looking ahead, calling for ways to forestall similar failures in infrastructure around California’s water resources.

On Friday, California Gov. Jerry Brown said he would ask the state legislature to approve $437 million in spending for flood control and emergency response and preparedness, including $387 million from a $7.5 billion water bond passed by voters in 2014, according to Reuters. Mr. Brown also said he would ask the federal government for additional funding and regulatory assistance in a letter sent to President Trump that same day.

And some scientists argue that the emergency should shine a light on how water authorities can prepare for climate-related crises of infrastructure, as The Christian Science Monitors Zack Colman reports:

"I think we can certainly say that under a warmer climate, more of California's winter precipitation will arrive as rain, rather than snow, so that these kinds of concerns about reservoir capacity will become increasingly urgent," Sally Thompson, an assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering at the University of California-Berkeley, says in an email.

To her it looks “premature” to draw a direct line from climate change to Oroville’s busting-at-the-seams reservoir. But she and others say it’s not an irrelevant line of inquiry.


“What we're looking at is the challenge - and it's a very real and scary challenge - of managing and maintaining aging infrastructure,” Thompson says. Some policy analysts hope that the Trump administration will include funding for aging dams in a planned infrastructure spending bill. Details of that plan have yet to emerge.

But Thompson adds that structural problems at dams have arisen elsewhere when heavy rains follow a period of prolonged drought, which some scientists contend is a fingerprint of climate change.

Environmental groups had questioned the suitablity of a second, supplementary spillway in 2005, when they asked federal regulators to require California to build a sturdier structure. But this month was the first time it had been tested. 

The Department of Water Resources says the inflow of water into the Oroville Dam this month was 570 percent of the average for February. Water levels in the reservoir reached capacity at 901 feet earlier in the month, although those have fallen nearly 60 feet since then.

This report contains material from the Associated Press and Reuters.

[Editor's note: An earlier version of this article incorrectly suggested that the spillway being cleared was the same spillway that raised concerns in 2005.]

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Workers begin clearing Oroville spillway debris as officials plan for the future
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today