Why California's eroding coast is a problem – and what the government can do

El Niño brought unprecedentedly powerful waves to the Pacific Coast in 2015-2016, while droughts starved beaches of sediment, according to a new study.

Jeff Gritchen/The Orange County Register/AP
Jerome Aken of Huntington Beach, Calif., looks for treasures in the sand at North Beach in San Clemente, Calif., on Monday, Jan. 23, 2017.

Last winter’s El Niño storms ate away an unprecedented amount of the West Coast’s beaches – which might provide a glimpse of the future.

A new study published this week in the journal Nature Communications finds that unusually powerful waves during the 2015-2016 El Niño season, combined with a lack of new sediment flushed down onto beaches, thanks to drought-starved coastal rivers, eroded 76 percent more sand than normal from 29 beaches in California, Washington, and Oregon.

"It looks like climate change will bring us more El Niño events, possibly twice as many, at twice the frequency as in the past," said David Hubbard, a co-author of the study and a University of California Santa Barbara marine ecologist, in a statement. "So this is a taste of what's coming."

Waves generated by storms across the North Pacific, added Patrick Barnard, a lead author and coastal scientist with the US Geological Survey, were "among the largest ever recorded."

"Further, the lack of rainfall means the coastal rivers produced very little sand to fill in what was lost from the beaches, so recovery has been slow," he said in a statement.

The study shines a light on one of the few environmental issues to earn bipartisan agreement in Congress: the need to protect the nation's eroding coastlines. Scientists expect that erosion, a normal process, will get worse as sea levels rise and climate change makes extreme weather events more extreme.

In the closing weeks of the Obama administration, Congress passed the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act, which directed the US Army Corps of Engineers to start 10 pilot projects through which sediment dredged up as part of other Army Corps activities would be used to restore and protect coastlines.

The agency finalizes its list of pilot cities this spring, and places like San Francisco, which lost 180 feet of sand on its Ocean Beach, are vying for a slot.

“Nobody opposes this,” Larry Goldzband, the executive director of the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, told the AP.

“Everybody wants beneficial reuse. The question is, how can it get done in a way that fits within budgets?”

Not every Pacific Coast beach suffered equally during the period studied. Relatively mild waves in the Pacific Northwest, and beach-augmentation programs that added sand to Southern California coastlines, helped stabilize some of them.

But it isn’t just sandy beaches and the organisms that live on them that are affected by rising seas and El Niño events: marshes and other coastal ecosystems need a steady supply of sediment to keep from disappearing.

"First we need to understand the challenges, and those include the rising sea level and the fact that most of the problems occur during these peak El Niño events," Dr. Hubbard said in the study's press release. "Then we need to restore or manage our coasts in ways that will enable us to deal with these events and conserve beach ecosystems. I think that's the challenge that we as a society have to address."

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why California's eroding coast is a problem – and what the government can do
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today