Larson C fracturing: Only 12 miles connect massive ice shelf to Antarctic

The giant rift in the Larsen C ice shelf has advanced more than 6 miles since January 1st, the MIDAS project announced on Friday. 

A rift in the Antarctic Peninsula's Larsen C ice shelf, which has grown over six miles since January 1. About 12 miles remain connecting the Delaware-sized ice chunk to the main shelf.

What might become one of the largest icebergs ever hangs by a thread from Antarctica's Larsen C ice shelf.

The vast rift has grown more than 6 miles longer since January 1, leaving an area reportedly the size of Delaware connected to the main shelf by a mere 10 percent of the total length, the British MIDAS project announced Thursday. Its loss threatens to destabilize the fourth-largest Antarctic ice shelf. 

When exactly that will be is unknowable, according to project leader and Swansea University glaciologist Adrian Luckman: "Although you might expect any extension to hasten the point of calving, it actually remains impossible to predict when it will break because the fracture process is so complex," he told BBC News. "My feeling is that this new development suggests something will happen within weeks to months, but there is an outside chance that further growth will be slow for longer than that.”

This break has been a long time coming, as The Christian Science Monitor reported earlier this week: what began as a tiny crack in the 1960s is now 90 miles wide, and almost one-third of a mile deep. Most of that change has taken place in just the past few years. 

While many instinctively assume that the calving is a result of global climate change, that may not necessarily be the case: It’s cracking, not melting. "This is probably not directly attributable to any warming in the region, although of course the warming won't have helped," Dr. Luckman told NPR. "It's probably just simply a natural event that's just been waiting around to happen."

This distinction differentiates it from its two companions, Larsen A and B, whose respective breakups in 1995 and 2002 appear to have been hastened by a series of warm summers.

Nor will this cracking directly contribute to the rise of the seas, as the Larsen C shelf already floats in the ocean. It can't affect water levels any more than a melting ice cube can cause a glass to overflow. Ice shelves do, however, play an indirect role.

Glaciers are dynamic rivers of ice that flow under the pressure of their own weight. Without the dams of floating ice shelves to hold them back, the glaciers that cover much of the Antarctic continent would be freer to flow into the ocean, displacing water and raising ocean levels.

Even after the rift tears through, as much as 90 percent of Larsen C will remain. However, the loss has the potential to destabilize the entire shelf. Previous work by the MIDAS project analyzed this risk, and scientists worry that Larsen C may eventually follow the example of its neighbor Larsen B, which “splintered and collapsed in just over one month,” according to the NASA Earth Observatory.

In such an event, all the ice held back by the shelf could raise global sea levels by as much as four inches, the BBC reported earlier this month.

If Larsen C goes the way of A and B, it will join a dozen other major ice shelves that have either broken up or significantly retreated in the last few decades, including Prince Gustav Channel, Larsen Inlet, Wordie, Muller, Jones Channel, and Wilkins, the BBC reports.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to