Why climate change could make extreme rain three times more likely

New climate models have allowed scientists to simulate future thunderstorms. Some states already being ravaged by flooding might expect more of the same, if global warming continues at current levels.

Matt Bell/Danville Register & Bee/AP
A truck motors through a flash flood on Park Avenue during a severe thunderstorm in Danville, Va., Sept. 28, 2016.

Extreme downpours could happen almost three times as often, and with a 70 percent increase in intensity, throughout the United States by the end of the century as a result of global warming, finds a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change.

Such storms could be especially common in parts of the Gulf Coast, Atlantic Coast, and Southwest, including in states like Louisiana and Texas, where such downpours have recently caused flooding that forced people from their homes and brought tens of thousands of petitions for flood relief, researchers say.

"These are huge increases," said lead author Andreas Prein, a scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), in a statement. "Imagine the most intense thunderstorm you typically experience in a single season. Our study finds that, in the future, parts of the U.S. could expect to experience five of those storms in a season, each with an intensity as strong or stronger than current storms."

The study was based on data produced by a model developed at the NCAR-Wyoming Supercomputing Center in Cheyenne, Wyo., capable of simulating individual storms. It’s part of the incremental march toward the development of more accurate, high-resolution computer simulations, which predict how global warming influences specific regions.

The team of researchers sought to model how storm frequency and intensity seen between 2000 and 2013 in the US would change if the temperature were 9 degrees F. warmer. That’s the level of global warming that scientists expect by the end of the century if current levels of carbon emissions continue.

That technique doesn’t take account possible alterations to weather systems and storm tracks caused by climate change, says Dr. Prein. But the fact that the model allowed the team to isolate the influence of additional heat and moisture on future storms was itself a "quantum leap in climate modeling," he added.

"This enables us to investigate changes in hourly rainfall extremes that are related to flash flooding for the very first time," he said.

In 2015, MIT Technology Review editor Richard Martin noted that current climate models aren’t very adept at predicting specific climate effects – like the rapid melting of Greenland’s Zachariae Isstrom glacier, which took scientists by surprise.

“[A]fter more than three decades, hundreds of millions of dollars, and countless scientist-hours invested,” Mr. Martin went on, “climate models have gotten much, much better.”

“But most climate scientists acknowledge that there are limits: no matter how sophisticated our models become, there will always be an irreducible element of chaos in the earth’s climate system that no supercomputer will ever eliminate,” he concluded.

Louisiana may already be getting a taste of what these kinds of changes look like after two feet of rain fell in the state in less than two days in August.  

“A flood like the one that ravaged Louisiana over the past few days has a 0.2 percent chance of occurring any given year and should only occur once every 500 to 1,000 years, according to scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),” The Christian Science Monitor reported in August.

“But there have been eight such storms in the United States alone since May 2015.... And Louisiana is not alone. In the last 15 months, Oklahoma, Texas, South Carolina, Maryland and West Virginia all experienced devastating floods – resulting in widespread injury, property damage, economic loss, and death – that give insight into what climate change looks like in action.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why climate change could make extreme rain three times more likely
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2016/1206/Why-climate-change-could-make-extreme-rain-three-times-more-likely
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe