Thailand's Buddhist 'Tiger Temple': Prison or sanctuary?

Government officials have cracked down on the 'Tiger Temple' in Thailand over animal trafficking and abuse allegations, which the Buddhist monks who operate the temple deny.

Wildlife Friends Foundation Thailand/AP
Cages are prepared for the removal of tigers at the 'Tiger Temple' in Saiyok district in Kanchanaburi province, west of Bangkok, Thailand, Monday.

Wildlife officials in Thailand say the tigers in the Buddhist “Tiger Temple” have to go.

Roughly a thousand state employees have begun a mission to remove and relocate 137 tigers from a popular tourist attraction west of Bangkok. The site is a Buddhist temple known for allowing visitors and monks making pilgrimages to interact with uncaged tigers.

The crackdown comes in response to increasing global pressure on the Thai government to close down wildlife trafficking operations in their countries and growing suspicions that the Buddhist temple could be involved in animal abuse and trafficking. The government has also tried to remove the tigers in the past, but were blocked by the temple’s abbots.

"We have a court warrant this time, unlike previous times, when we only asked for the temple's cooperation, which did not work," Adisorn Nuchdamrong, deputy director-general of the Department of National Parks, told Reuters. "International pressure concerning illegal wildlife trafficking is also part of why we're acting now."

The chorus of critics who say the temple could be supplying the black market with fresh supplies of exotic animals include People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, the Thai government, and Thai wildlife conservation officials.

Supporters of the temple and the monks deny the allegations:

"If there's any illegal trading or smuggling, there would have been ... evidence," Supitpong Pakdijarung, managing director of the Tiger Temple Co, told NBC News. "It has been more than a year and the case hasn't gone anywhere."

Christian Science Monitor contributor Tibor Krausz visited the temple in 2006. The abbot of the temple, Venerable Phusit Khantitharo, likewise painted a very different depiction of a tiger sanctuary that grew as a result of Mr. Phusit’s reputation as an animal lover and a necessity to care for abandoned tiger cubs, as Mr. Krausz wrote:

Phusit had by then acquired a reputation locally as a Dr. Doolittle of sorts, treating and feeding a variety of injured wild animals and abandoned pets brought to his care. Thunderstorm's mother had been poached in the lawless jungles near the Thai-Burmese border. A few weeks later, Storm and his twin were brought to the monastery by locals – their mother, too, killed by poachers.

'I didn't know what to do with them, but I couldn't just let them die,' Phusit recalls. Soon another cub was brought, and another. 'Poachers think the bad karma of killing a tigress is cancelled out by saving her cubs.'

Unable to shake rumors of potential animal trafficking and abuse, government officials now plan on removing all tigers from the temple soon.

Officials moved seven tigers on Monday and 33 on Tuesday. Another 97 remain at the temple, until authorities can finalize plans for their removal.

Mr. Nuchdamrong told Reuters the wildlife department plans on moving all of the tigers to state-owned sanctuaries.

This report includes material from Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.