OPEC fails to stop falling oil prices. Does the cartel still have sway?

Has OPEC, the group of 13 oil-exporting nations, lost its ability to impact world oil prices? Or is Saudi Arabia using low oil prices for its own ends? 

Hasan Jamali/AP
Oil workers dig at a facility site in the desert oil fields of Sakhir, Bahrain, Monday, Dec. 7, 2015. U.S. stocks are dropping in early trading Monday as investors dump energy companies on lower oil prices. Benchmark U.S. crude is trading near its closing low for the year following a decision by OPEC last week not to cut production.(AP Photo/

Officials with the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) left a meeting this past Friday without a plan to deal with oil prices that have fallen 40 percent in the past year. 

It's an early Christmas gift for the oil-consuming public and the global economy, but it raises questions about what could prompt OPEC to act. This inaction clears the way for oil prices to drop even further into next year, The Wall Street Journal reported. Low oil prices act as an economic stimulus to many oil-dependent nations. 

"Any tiny risk that OPEC actually might do something during the next 6 months is completely off the table after Friday's meeting," said Bjarne Schieldrop, SEB Markets chief commodities analyst, according to the Journal. "With this risk out of the picture, the oil price declines further." 

Oil prices (now hovering at around $40 per barrel) have not dropped enough yet to force the cartel to act, global oil expert Larry Goldstein of the Energy Policy Research Foundation told The Associated Press a year ago, citing the drop from $147 to $34 that prompted a unified OPEC response in 2008. It seems prices still haven't fallen low enough for long enough to bring action as a cartel. 

"(OPEC) is a crisis-management entity," Goldstein told the AP. "As a cartel, OPEC hasn't been functional for several decades."

Some other analysts have agreed that years of inaction show that OPEC – the group that single-handedly shifted the world economy in the 1970s – is not what it used to be.

"OPEC countries do exactly what we would expect them to do if there were no such thing as OPEC," Jeff Colgan, a Brown University political science professor who studies OPEC, told the Associated Press.

It could also show that Saudi Arabia is playing a sophisticated game with long-term, geopolitical stakes, Roby Barrett, an expert on oil and the Persian Gulf at the Middle East Institute in Washington, D.C., told The Christian Science Monitor in an interview. What Americans view as good news at the gas pump is also good news to the government officials in charge of Saudi Arabia's foreign policy.

"All of this railing in the newspapers that the Saudis are in deep, deep trouble – the Saudis are the ones causing the trouble," Mr. Barrett says. "[The rest of] OPEC doesn't have a choice because they have to have the money [from oil exports]."

Pulling the bottom out from oil prices is a game Saudi Arabia is both well-equipped for and experienced at playing. Barrett says Saudi Arabia's oil production capabilities are so high and its population so small that it can handle low oil prices much better than its geopolitical rivals in Iraq, Russia, and Iran.

Saudi Arabia's decision to keep oil production high could mean that they still have enough cash to withstand low oil prices, and those will be especially destructive to the economy of regional rival and fellow oil producer Iran. Another Saudi target appears to be America's burgeoning shale-oil industry, writes energy blogger Kurt Cobb.

"The oil cartel explicitly stated at its most recent meeting that it is trying to destroy US tight oil production by making it unprofitable. One of the things a cartel can do – if it controls enough market share – is destroy competition through a price war."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to OPEC fails to stop falling oil prices. Does the cartel still have sway?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2015/1209/OPEC-fails-to-stop-falling-oil-prices.-Does-the-cartel-still-have-sway
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe