Why isn't more attention being paid to Indonesia's catastrophic wildfires?

A massive forest fire burning across Indonesia is wreaking havoc on the environment. Few are paying attention. 

Darren Whiteside/Reuters
An Indonesian soldier checks on a peat land fire near Palangkaraya, central Kalimantan, Indonesia October 28, 2015. Indonesia's weather agency failed to predict that the effects of the El Nino weather phenomenon this year would be worse than in 1997, a senior minister said on Wednesday, as the government considers declaring a national emergency due to forest fires. The fires raging across the archipelago have created a haze that has blanketed much of Southeast Asia in recent months and, according to authorities, have left more than half a million Indonesians suffering from respiratory ailments.

A forest fire that has been raging since early October has claimed over 19 deaths and affected half a million lives in Indonesia. It has been called “the greatest environmental disaster of the 21st century.” 

The fire was set to clear land for palm oil and pulp-and-paper plantations. But things got out of hand due to a prolonged dry season and heavy winds from El Niño warming in the Pacific. Then things got really out of hand: endangered wildlife is at high risk of being exterminated, and six Indonesian provinces have declared themselves to be in a state of emergency. NASA has claimed it to be Indonesia’s worst fire.   

But the fire, which has burned across the 5,000-kilometer length of Indonesia and released more CO2 than Germany does in a year, has gone virtually unreported by the mass media.

“It is surely, on any objective assessment, more important than anything else taking place today. And it shouldn’t require a columnist, writing in the middle of a newspaper, to say so,” wrote George Monibot in a Guardian op-ed. “It should be on everyone’s front page.”

While Western media has covered the story, it has rarely been on page one. The New York Times wrote about the endangered wildlife being driven from the forests and rain that’s dampened the forest, and published an op-ed last week on how to save Indonesia’s rainforests. The Economist and the Wall Street Journal have written about the toxic haze spreading from the fire. The Washington Post and Bloomberg wrote about how the fires were polluting the climate.

The story is undoubtedly major. Damage from the fire is costing Indonesia more than $35 billion. Over 40 million people are breathing in fumes from the haze.

So why are so few paying attention to the crisis?

“Well, there’s a question with a thousand answers,” Mr. Monibot wrote. “Many of which involve power.”

Indonesia’s fire is expected to have devastating effects: palm oil production will drop by 10 to 20 percent, the bee population will be significantly reduced, and the haze is already spreading to other parts of Asia, such as southern Thailand.

Even though the Indonesian fire isn't front page news, the story continues.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why isn't more attention being paid to Indonesia's catastrophic wildfires?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today