What's killing whales off Alaska's shores?

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration says that the deaths may be linked to a toxic algae bloom in the Pacific Ocean, which first appeared in May.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/AP
A fin whale carcass is surrounded by bears in Larson Bay, Alaska, June 13. A federal agency announced plans, Thursday, for a more intense investigation into what caused the deaths of 30 large whales in the western Gulf of Alaska since May. NOAA Fisheries declared the deaths an 'unusual mortality event,' triggering a new-level investigation that brings with it access to additional resources. The agency said the deaths are about three times the historical average for the region.

US marine biologists have launched an investigation into the mysterious deaths of 30 large whales in the western Gulf of Alaska.

It is still not clear what caused the mass death, but National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) spokeswoman Julie Speegle said Friday that the incident may be linked to a toxic algae bloom in the Pacific Ocean, Reuters reported.

“Biotoxins will be one of the top priorities but not the only priority that we’ll be looking at to rule in or rule out whether it’s playing a role in this death investigation and these mortalities, both in Canada and the US,” Ms. Speegle said.

The bloom initially appeared in May, the same month that the first of the dead whales was spotted.

But Speegle says that infectious diseases are also possible culprits in the death of whales, as are other environmental factors.

The 30 dead whales washed ashore along a span of coastline stretching more than 1,000 miles from south of Anchorage to the Aleutian Islands. The strandings tally amounts to almost three times the historical average for such whale deaths in the region, NOAA said.

According to NOAA, officials said at a teleconference on Thursday that the whale deaths may be tied to a larger marine pattern.

The formal investigation is expected to begin as early as September, and could take months, even years, of data collection and analysis, Speegle said Friday.

One difficulty is to reach the dead whales to get samples, as Alaska’s coastline is vast, largely uninhabited and jagged in many places, according to Bree Witteveen, a Kodiak-based marine mammal specialist with the Alaska Sea Grant program.

“It’s unfortunate, but we just cannot get to those carcasses more often than not,” she said.

Researchers are examining some of the dead whales while, according to NOAA, some are also working on samples of harvested seafood, forage fish and the waters where the dead whales swam.

“It’s going to take a bit of time to pull it all together,” said Teri Rowles, lead marine mammal scientist for NOAA Fisheries. “And each of these individual species that are examined are really important to us as we put the whole ecosystem picture together.”

This report includes material from Reuters and The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.