The roots of forest preservation

Two countries in the Amazon basin have slowed deforestation through community peacemaking. 

|
Reuters
An aerial view shows a deforested area during an operation to combat deforestation near Uruara, Para State, Brazil.

A few years ago, world leaders pledged to “halt and reverse” global tree loss by 2030 in response to climate change. Brazil and Colombia show how that might be done. The two South American countries slowed deforestation in the Amazon River basin between 2022 and 2023 by 36% and 49% respectively, according to new data from the University of Maryland.

Those reductions rest on the idea that environmental challenges are opportunities for renewing trust in societies torn by conflict or weakened by corrupt and distant governments. That represents a growing consensus among conservationists and peace-builders that their fields are inseparable.

Both Brazil and Colombia have tied environmental progress to local empowerment. In Brazil, President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva returned to power last year vowing to reverse the rapid acceleration of rainforest loss that occurred under his predecessor. He restored conservation regulations and bolstered law enforcement in the country’s forests. Perhaps more importantly, President da Silva, popularly known as Lula, has made Indigenous peoples in the Amazon basin key stewards of his conservation strategy.

In Colombia, where splintered guerrilla warfare has endured for more than half a century, armed groups have engaged in illicit deforestation to fund their causes. President Gustavo Petro has made forestry protection central to his goal of negotiating peace simultaneously with dozens of armed factions and criminal gangs. That strategy is similar to a community-based conservation strategy in Rwanda that draws neighbors together in mandatory local initiatives each month to encourage peaceful coexistence.

Colombian officials have traveled the country promoting a toolkit for local environmental action that emphasizes Indigenous rights, community leadership, and shared stewardship of natural resources. The country has reversed tree loss in part by encouraging armed militias to become partners in protecting biodiversity.

Such community meetings often entail a touch of humility on all sides. “Please excuse us for talking so long, but we’ve never had this opportunity,” one local leader told Colombian officials during a public gathering on peace and environmental issues that lasted three hours.

“The story of deforestation in Colombia is ... deeply intertwined with the country’s politics,” Alejandra Laina, director of natural resources in the Colombia office of World Resources Institute, told the BBC last week. “There is no doubt that recent government action and the commitment of the communities has had a profound impact on Colombia’s forests.”

In countries emerging from conflict or periods of political instability, environmental problems often exacerbate instability. Yet as the editors of the journal Environment and Security noted last month, “bottom-up initiatives that strengthen community cohesion while addressing climate impacts and environmental degradation” show promise. In Brazil and Colombia, progress in saving forests also marks progress in mutual respect and rule of law.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to The roots of forest preservation
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2024/0408/The-roots-of-forest-preservation
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe