What Ukraine can teach the US about Russian meddling

As details emerge in the indictments by the special consul probe, Americans can learn how to respond by looking at Ukraine’s long experience with Moscow’s interference.

Reuters
Anti-corruption and pro-European Union protesters gather the Ukrainian parliament building in Kiev, Ukraine Oct.19,

Nearly a year after the presidential election, Americans are finally learning hard details about Russian attempts to meddle in the 2016 campaign – just in time to prevent a recurrence of any Moscow-directed interference in the 2018 midterm elections.

On Oct. 30, special counsel Robert Mueller announced the indictments of two former leaders of the Trump campaign while revealing that another former campaign member had pleaded guilty to lying to federal officials about ties with Russian contacts. In addition, Congress learned this week of the extensive disinformation campaign by Russian agents on Facebook, Twitter, and Google’s YouTube.

Together, these revelations represent small steps that might eventually help ensure the integrity of the US electoral system. Much more can be done, such as beefing up American cybersecurity and demanding transparency by media giants. Yet the United States can also learn from one of the first countries targeted by Russian President Vladimir Putin’s regime with a massive disinformation campaign – Ukraine.

Since the 2014 mass protests in Kiev that ousted a Russian ally, then-President Viktor Yanukovych, Ukrainians have steeled themselves against Russian influence in their politics and media. Rather than being duped by disinformation, they have embraced their country’s free press and demanded ever-stronger measures against official corruption.

In addition, the country has ended its dependence on Russian gas for its energy supplies. Many Russian-speaking people in a country of 45 million now prefer to use the Ukrainian language and to shun Russian-language media directed from Moscow. Ukrainians also hold firm hopes of joining the European Union and NATO.

To safeguard their democracy, in other words, the Ukrainian people have embraced a national identity based on common ideals of freedom and truth. Defensive measures against foreign meddling are not enough. After years of enduring Russian influence over Ukrainian politicians, citizens there are more demanding of transparency in governance, social media, and the commercial press.

Ukraine’s experience even led it to warn Facebook – back in 2015 – that Russia had planted fake news on the social media platform, according to the Financial Times.

As Americans learn more about Russia’s role in the 2016 campaign, Ukraine provides a lesson in how to respond. A stronger sense of national citizenship can do much to guard the purity of the democratic process.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.