When disaster brings reconciliation

A massive flood in Colombia brought an offer of aid from a rebel group, another example of how disasters can bring people together and alter the course of history.

Rescuers walk in a flooded river with chainsaws to rescue people caught in devastation from heavy rains in Mocoa, Colombia April 2.

Natural disasters often create unexpected bonds between people, even long-time rivals, which can then alter the course of history. A good example was an offer made Monday by armed rebels in Colombia to assist in the recovery of a town hit by a flood over the weekend. At least 262 civilians were killed by the flooding and more than a thousand were made homeless. “We are ready to help,” stated the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC).

Colombia’s government is in the midst of ending a half-century of war with the FARC. The tragedy in the town of Mocoa offered an opportunity for 400 rebels encamped nearby to show they are prepared to work with the government and forsake killing for cooperation. Their humanitarian gesture could help break down political barriers and provide an antidote to a long war.

Another example of disaster-related reconciliation occurred in 2004 when a tsunami struck the province of Aceh in Indonesia, killing some 130,000. The mass devastation and the aid provided by the Army forced a group of rebels to end its 30-year struggle for Aceh’s independence. The government and rebels signed a peace deal the next year.

In recent years, countries opposed to North Korea’s nuclear program have nonetheless offered food aid during a famine. The United States Navy has helped rescue stranded Iranian fishermen. A Russian tanker has brought an emergency supply of winter fuel to the isolated Alaskan city of Nome. 

China and Japan, despite their rivalry in Asia, have offered aid to each other after recent disasters. Japanese teams searched for survivors after China’s 2008 earthquake while Chinese rescuers reciprocated after Japan’s 2011 earthquake and tsunami. After a 2005 earthquake in Pakistan, India delivered assistance to its longtime rival.

Yet these latter examples also illustrate the difficulty of resolving many geopolitical conflicts. Japan and China are at odds over an island dispute, while North Korea, Iran, and Russia are only winning more adversaries. India and Pakistan continue their estrangement

One notable example came after a massive cyclone hit Myanmar (Burma) in 2008. The disaster opened the opportunity for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, which includes Myanmar, to both offer relief and open a new dialogue with the government. This created enough trust for ASEAN to push Myanmar to move toward democracy. In 2010, the country held free and fair elections.

Missions of mercy have a way of softening hard hearts between adversaries. Differences dissolve in the face of suffering and an outpouring of empathy. Politicians cannot afford to play political football with disaster relief. A moment of mutual respect and cooperation after a disaster can linger long past the memory of loss.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to When disaster brings reconciliation
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today