Ukraine’s suit of moral armor against Russia

The hot conflict in Ukraine has forced that country to seek legal help from the UN’s highest court. In a suit against Russia, it hopes to expose the truth about the Kremlin’s role in the killing of civilians in Ukraine.

AP Photo
Ukraine's Deputy Foreign Minister Olena Zerkal, second left, and Ukraine's agent Vsevolod Chentsov, left, wait for the start of proceedings at the International Court of Justice in The Hague, Netherlands, March 6, 2017. Ukraine is taking Russia to the United Nations' highest judicial organ, accusing Moscow of financing separatist rebels and racially discriminating against ethnic Tartars and Ukrainians in the annexed Crimea peninsula.

For a country under attack since 2014 from Russian-backed forces, Ukraine certainly has faith in the power of moral law. On March 6, it opened a legal case against Russia in the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The suit seeks remedies for the killing of civilians in Ukraine based on several international laws. Merely convincing the United Nations’ highest court of such atrocities could help put a needed spotlight on President Vladimir Putin’s role in this hot conflict.

“Truth is stronger than arms!” Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko wrote on his Facebook page as the court case opened before 16 judges in The Hague. Russia’s forceful taking of the Crimean Peninsula three years ago and its ongoing military support of separatists in eastern Ukraine have challenged the security order in Europe at its core. The court case is an attempt to restore the Continent’s moral norms, such as respect for territorial integrity, that have kept Europe at peace for decades.

Russia is a party to the ICJ and obliged to follow its rulings. Ukraine’s suit also seeks remedies for the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 in 2014, which killed 298 passengers and crew. An investigation led by the Netherlands found the plane had been shot down with a Russian-made missile from an area controlled by pro-Russian forces. The suit also calls on Russia to end discrimination against the non-Russian minorities in Crimea.

The EU has already imposed economic sanctions on Russia for its actions in Ukraine but with little effect so far on Kremlin behavior. If the ICJ decides in Ukraine’s favor, it could deliver a blow to Russia’s reputation. Mr. Putin’s aggressive meddling in European elections, as well as Russian hacking in last year’s American presidential campaign, has begun to backfire on him.

Putin may now realize that Russia needs to use “soft power” to achieve its objectives in Europe. Last week, for example, he finally admitted that Russian athletics had engaged in large-scale doping at international competitions. Russia’s anti-doping system had failed, he said, adding that it was “our fault and we should acknowledge it.” His admission may help persuade Olympic organizers to allow Russian athletes to participate in future Games.

If Ukraine’s president is right, a court’s recognition of the truth about Russian-backed violence in his country may be an effective weapon. Exposing a grievous error against the light of universal justice is a way to triumph over it.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.