Why Trump’s ‘forgotten’ must include the homeless

The latest data again confirms a steady decline in homelessness, a result of local and federal efforts under both Obama and Bush. The key has been housing for the homeless and volunteers who form trusting bonds.

Marisa Wojcik/The Eau Claire Leader-Telegram via AP
Mike Cohoon, a pastor at Landmark Christian Church, stands on the porch of a tiny house behind United Methodist Church in Chippewa Falls, Wis. Mr. Cohoon is part of the Chippewa Falls Mission Coalition – a group of 17 area churches – that is assisting homeless people by building small houses for them.

One of the enduring and bipartisan ideas in Washington for more than 13 years, championed by both Barack Obama and George W. Bush, has been that homelessness can be licked. It is an audacious goal, one that relies on a strategy called “housing first”: Give the homeless a sense of dignity by providing a permanent residence and then try to meet all their other needs. As Donald Trump prepares to occupy the White House, it is worth asking: Does this strategy still work?

The data is pretty clear. Since 2007, the number of individuals and families who are considered chronically homeless has declined 35 percent. In 2016, the number dropped again, by 3 percent to 550,000 people. This is steady progress in implementing a worthwhile idea, or what Mary Cunningham of the Urban Institute calls “a complete paradigm shift in how communities respond to chronic homelessness and people living on the street.”

While the “housing first” idea has been essential, so too has been the federal push for local people and agencies to work personally with each homeless person to solve his or her complex problems, from addiction to domestic abuse to job loss. Trusting, long-term relationships with volunteers, many of whom come from the faith community, have made a huge difference. They offer the stability and affection that keep many of the homeless from cycling through jails, shelters, rehab centers, and the streets. 

The federal government has provided a critical vision of how to treat the homeless – the dignity that comes from being rooted in a community – as well as billions in assistance. The economics also make sense. One study, focused on central Florida, found a homeless person can cost taxpayers about $30,000 a year if he or she stays on the streets. That cost drops to $10,000 when a homeless person has a residence and support. But while government services are necessary, the progress toward ending homelessness also requires loving and supportive volunteers who know the resources to solve the problems that cause homelessness.

Mr. Trump says he represents the “forgotten” in the United States, and that certainly includes the homeless. Perhaps he’ll be the third president in a row to aim for the goal of ending homelessness.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.