Where Trump’s success is everyone’s success

To bind the nation, Democrats and Republicans must quickly agree to solve a common problem: rebuilding the nation’s roads, bridges, and other infrastructure. It would be an easy win-win, setting a healing tone.

AP Photo
A road construction project backs up traffic in Springfield, Ill. Donald Trump has vowed to rebuild the nation’s roads, bridges, airports and railways.

The 2016 presidential election was hardly like the Civil War. Yet with the continuing rancor over Donald Trump’s victory, it is worth recalling Lincoln’s advice toward the end of that great conflict: “Let us strive on to ... bind up the nation’s wounds.” Hillary Clinton caught that spirit in her concession speech by saying Americans owe Mr. Trump “a chance to succeed.” And President Obama said “we are now all rooting for his success in uniting and leading the country.”

For his part, the president-elect not only called for unity but said his top priority would be to achieve something that both he and Mrs. Clinton promised: To bind up the nation’s wounded infrastructure of bridges, highways, tunnels, and airports.

Washington needs a rallying point soon after this tough election, and nothing creates more political consensus than the view that public structures, from streets to levees, are crumbling. The average age of infrastructure has been increasing since the late 1960s, creating worries that it is creating a slowdown in productivity. To boost innovation, the United States must tackle its transport bottlenecks.

Polls indicate wide support for improving infrastructure. One survey found Southern California drivers would pay $20 a commute for traffic-free highways. And in a number of ballot measures this month, voters from Atlanta to Seattle backed projects for transit and highways. That local consensus should now be reflected in Congress.

If Democrats and Republicans can get off to a bipartisan start on this issue, it might set a healing tone for others to come. One mistake by both parties after Mr. Obama’s victory in 2008 and the sweep of Congress by Democrats was that both parties only hardened their positions. Instead of collaborating on the first major legislation, an economic stimulus package, they struck a fighting pose, which lasted for eight years.

To be sure, Trump and Congress must work on the gritty details of how to finance infrastructure projects and which ones are most important. Democrats seek direct spending by a government entity, aimed mainly at creating jobs and helping cities. Trump wants to tap private capital for building projects, using tax credits as incentives, with states and localities setting priorities.

Such differences, however, can be resolved if both parties want a fresh start and are willing to give the new president “a chance to succeed.” Politics need not always be “my way or the highway.” It can also be “our way is better highways.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Where Trump’s success is everyone’s success
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today