A Mideast beachhead for reconciliation

Lebanon’s election of a new president not only marks its own attempt to reconcile religious factions but shows how Lebanon can be a model for other Middle East countries caught in religious violence.

AP Photo
Supporters of Christian leader Michel Aoun hold his picture and Lebanese flags to celebrate his Oct. 31 election as President and the end of a two-year vacuum in the top post.

With multiple wars being waged in the Middle East over religious differences, Lebanon has decided that it must hold even tighter to its constitutional democracy and especially its unique formula of peaceful coexistence between its many sects. On Monday, its parliament ended a long stalemate between the country’s religious-based political factions and chose a new president, Michel Aoun, a Maronite Christian.

The post had been empty for more than two years, a result in large part of the regional rivalry between Iran and Saudi Arabia over which one represents Islam in the Middle East. Lebanon’s domestic politics are complex but they are easily influenced by outside forces. With the war next door in Syria getting worse, Lebanon was ready to reassert its model of political reconciliation under an arrangement dating back to the 1940s.

Electing a Christian as president is now expected to lead to choosing a Sunni Muslim as prime minister, which will most likely be Saad Hariri, a local businessman and son of former prime minister. The speaker of the parliament is a Shiite Muslim, Nabih Berri.

The Lebanese don’t just read about Syria’s war. One in 4 people in the country is a Syrian refugee. And one Lebanese group, the powerful Shiite Islamist group, Hezbollah, helps prop up the Syrian regime with its militia. Such proximity to war only helps reinforce a popular desire for resolving disputes.

The Middle East needs more models like Lebanon to show how different faiths can share power through constitutional means. Lebanon learned from its own 1975-1990 civil war that sectarian coexistence is essential. At the same time, its young people are more demanding of secular government. An estimated 20 percent of marriages are now between Sunnis and Shiites (dubbed “SuShi”), or between Muslims and Christians.

Lebanon’s politics must still evolve away from sect-based political leaders. The new president and the next prime minister will need to rise above their religious constituencies to solve the country’s many problems, such as electoral reform. Behind the scenes, many of the country’s religious leaders have worked together to support a constitutional democracy, one in which minority faiths are respected.

Together with Tunisia’s example as an Arab democracy that is lessening religious tensions, Lebanon has taken a big step to be a worthy example in a region torn by violence between rival sects.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.