Orlando’s counternarrative to Islamic State

After the nightclub shooting by an Islamic State follower, people in Orlando respond in ways that show how the radical group can be defeated in Iraq and Syria.

People hug before a prayer service at Knowles Memorial Chapel the day after a mass shooting at the Pulse gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida, June 13.

The people of Orlando, Fla., have sent an important message to Islamic State after a young shooter, Omar Mateen, killed or injured more than 100 in a nightclub in the name of the extremist group. By the thousands, citizens have held vigils, gathered to pray, donated blood, and taken other actions in an outpouring of affection and comfort. They, along with many Americans, are discussing different reforms that might prevent more mass killings by disturbed individuals based on hate or terror.

The city, in other words, rallied to fill the empty darkness of a tragedy inspired by a group that is known for little else except violence and what it opposes.

Orlando’s counternarrative of hope should serve as an example of what is still needed on a larger scale in the Middle East to bring about the crumbling of Islamic State’s so-called caliphate. Since it took over parts of Syria and Iraq in 2014, the radical group has been losing followers. It is struggling to win recruits from abroad as word spreads about the hardships of life under its rule. And an American-led coalition of nations has reduced the flow of money to IS and taken back nearly half its territory with drones and military advances.

“I think we’ve begun to undermine the [IS] narrative,” Marine Gen. Joseph Dunford, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, recently told Congress.

A year ago, the group’s leader, who goes by the name Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, called for jihad worldwide, especially in the West. This was seen as a sign that the caliphate is faltering under its internal contradictions, especially corruption and unequal rule of law. The killings in Orlando, like similar ones elsewhere in the United States and in Europe either inspired or directed by IS, are really a sign of the group’s possible collapse.

What’s needed now is progress in peace and good governance in both Syria and Iraq. Sunni and Shiite leaders in Iraq must reconcile and form a government of national unity. Pro-democracy forces in Syria should coalesce behind peace talks and on the battlefield. And outside powers must better cooperate to push these antidotes to IS.

“We cannot kill our way out of this war,” says Lt. Gen. Robert Otto, Air Force deputy chief of staff for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance.

As IS’s allure to alienated young Muslims falters, it must be replaced by something of lasting substance. The reactions in Orlando to the killings is a reminder of what it will take.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.