Why wager on March Madness brackets?

As gambling on the men’s collegiate basketball finals has grown, the NCAA is now promoting the ‘brackets.’ Amateur sports does not need the taint of corrosive gambling.

AP Photo
This photo shows a portion of the bracket of the NCAA college basketball tournament for this year.

To the rest of the world, Americans seem obsessed with this year’s presidential contest. But consider this comparison:

For three weeks in March, the number of forms (“brackets”) expected to be filled out by fans to predict the winners in the finals of men’s collegiate basketball will be greater than the number of ballots cast for Barack Obama in the last election.

Why this obsession with this National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) tournament, which is otherwise known as March Madness?

For most bracket-fillers in the US, making a prediction on the 68-team field is not simply for the thrill of trying to beat others in basketball knowledge. The average bet per bracket has now reached an estimated $29, making gambling on this amateur sport a prime attraction. And even though placing money down on a sports game is illegal in most states, nearly 40 million to 50 million Americans are expected to join in the “fun,” many of them in office pools.

The NCAA itself has long argued against gambling on its sports. It does not want its school athletes corrupted in any way to throw a game. The league has even informed daily fantasy sports operators DraftKings and FanDuel that they cannot advertise during championship events.

But this year the NCAA decided to join up with Microsoft’s search engine, Bing, to help fans fill out their brackets. And it is promoting the brackets even though the National Council on Problem Gambling estimates 5 million Americans have a gambling addiction.

March Madness, says the council’s executive director, Keith Whyte, “has become a national gambling holiday.” In fact, the group recently designated March as Problem Gambling Awareness Month.

To add to the problem, employers are expected to lose at least $1.9 billion in lost productivity at the office because of worker chatter over NCAA bracketology, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas, a Chicago-based global outplacement firm.

Gambling on sports has many negative effects, but none more so than that it counters the very purpose of sports as a measure of talent, effort, and teamwork. A popular belief in luck as a godlike force should never supplant the desire to see athletes express these qualities. Few Americans place bets on the presidential contests, which are a serious exercise of public life. Why sully sports with even a small wager?

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.