The integrity of the Internet will soon be maintained by a nongovernmental body (ICANN) set up to represent the web’s many stakeholders. The model of governance reflects the values of the web itself: equality and a mutual regard among users.

AP Photo
Afghanis access social media websites at a private Internet cafe in Kabul, Afghanistan.

If you are an Internet user, you will soon become an Internet citizen. This week, at an international meeting in Morocco, an independent body is expected to be given the authority to represent all “stakeholders” in cyberspace – all billions of them. In democratic fashion, this supranational agency will guide the largely intangible universe of bits and bytes that now distributes information and ideas to anyone online.

The body being handed this unearthly task is the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or ICANN. The nonprofit organization currently assigns only domain names, such as .com or .org. Its new and far more powerful duties will be a novel experiment in how to manage a global resource like the web and its complex digital plumbing.

The novelty lies in this: National governments, whether elected or authoritarian, will have little or no influence over the new agency, which will be headed by a 16-member board held accountable to users. Other global regulatory bodies, such as the International Telecommunications Union, are controlled by governments.

The reason to keep governments at arm’s length comes out of the nature of the Internet itself. The technology allows equality across all humanity. And the web has succeeded largely because of an inherent goodwill among most users to treat one other as they want to be treated.

Those ideas are foundational integrity of any democratic “society” like the Internet. They are based on a  view of the individual as capable of self-government. Reflecting this view, ICANN will operate day to day with a consensus of its committees that represent users from civil society to the industry that builds and maintains the web’s hardware. Its founding constitution will create an elaborate system of checks and balances, including an independent judiciary.

The United States, which was the Internet’s original steward and has maintained a loose control over its infrastructure, is expected to hand over its remaining powers this September. The US began the process of privatizing ICANN in 1998.

The body is not charged with solving the big challenges facing the Internet, such as cyberattacks and piracy of intellectual property. Governments still have a role in solving these problems. But ICANN’s launch as guardian of the Internet’s infrastructure marks progress in human thinking about self-governance and the social contract needed to sustain it.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.