Endgame for an opiate epidemic

When US governors met in Washington, their focus was on novel ways to deal with a rise in nonmedical use of prescription opiates. Vermont’s governor had some answers. 

AP Photo
Gov. Peter Shumlin, D-Vt., right, testifies at a Jan. 27 Senate hearing in Washington as Sen. Kelly Ayotte, D-N.H., left, Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, listen. The Senate Judiciary Committee hearing focused on attacking America’s epidemic of heroin and prescription drug abuse.

Two years ago, Gov. Peter Shumlin of Vermont shocked many by devoting his entire annual message to what he called “a full-blown ... crisis” in opiate addiction in his small New England state. His campaign to reduce opioid prescriptions and improve treatment for addicts has since caught on. This week, the country’s rising abuse of heroin and other opioids dominated a meeting of the National Governors Association in Washington. The bipartisan group also pestered President Obama and Congress to do more.

States remain on the front lines of dealing with the opioid epidemic, which makes Vermont’s experience especially worth noting. The state has moved from a jail-first model to a “rapid intervention” system that quickly assesses whether an addict needs mental-health services. Since 2014, Vermont has increased the number of drug-treatment centers by more than 65 percent. But more than that, says Mr. Shumlin, the state has lifted the stigma that surrounds seeking treatment for drug addiction. Many police departments now welcome addicts to come forward, not to be arrested but to be offered help.

Or as the governor puts it: “We’ll help you get your life back, you’ll never see a judge, a prosecutor or a criminal record.” He estimates the state has saved about $50 million by not locking up many addicts.

Shumlin often thanks Vermonters for “changing their attitudes about addiction and opioid addiction.” The shift has encouraged so many addicts to come out of the shadows that the state’s treatment centers, despite an increase in number, have long waiting lists. Other states are experiencing the same problem as they move to a treatment-first model. In fact, much of the pitch by the governors in Washington was for more federal funding for drug treatment facilities.

Shumlin says states also need federal help to curb the overprescription of powerful painkillers too often used for nonmedical purposes. “Until America is willing to have an honest conversation about the way we are dealing with pain, our challenges will continue,” he says. At their meeting, the governors developed protocols for each state to use in ensuring safer prescribing of opioids. In the United States, an estimated 74 people a day are fatally overdosing on opioids such as heroin or prescription drugs. The number is greater than deaths from gunshots or motor vehicle crashes.

Vermont’s approach is based on an assumption that addicts can be healed and have a right to good mental health. Like other states, it is still struggling with resources and finding the right strategy. Many communities do not welcome treatment centers. And not enough legal users properly discard their unused pain medication. But the hard work of shifting attitudes has begun.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.