Obama’s call for Muslims to stand up

Among the president’s anti-Islamic State tactics is an appeal to Muslim leaders to assert an Islam based on universal values such as dignity, respect, and tolerance. Yet the US and Europe also must embrace these values to defeat all types of terrorism.

American Shia Muslims march to the White House to protest against Islamic State Dec. 6.

In a televised speech Sunday, President Obama laid out a range of tasks necessary to defeat Islamic State and prevent another shooting like that in San Bernardino, Calif. Perhaps the most difficult yet critical task was this: that Muslim leaders speak out against interpretations of Islam that are “incompatible with the values of religious tolerance, mutual respect, and human dignity.”

Mr. Obama’s charge to Muslims is to “decisively and unequivocally” assert a view of Islam that not only includes these values but claims them as universal. It is not enough to merely condemn the terrorist violence of a fringe group of Muslims or help security officials detect extremists in Muslim communities. The task is to safeguard a major world religion of more than a billion people in its core theology.

Obama is not the first American president to try to assist Muslims in overcoming doctrinal divisions by seeking a unified, affirmative, and peaceful approach. After 9/11, President George W. Bush said Islam is a faith that “has made brothers and sisters of every race. It’s a faith based upon love, not hate.”

For sure, the war on Islamic State can be won by many means, from drone drops to phone taps to gun curbs. But the decisive victory will lie in the Islamic world’s embrace of values that create a civic, inclusive, and peaceful order. This is an offensive strategy designed to prevent aggrieved and angry Muslims from going down “the dark path of radicalization,” as Obama called it.

The West can do only so much to resolve this struggle within Islam over the use of violence to assert power. Groups like Al Qaeda and Islamic State have killed far more Muslims than non-Muslims. The struggle may appear mainly violent but it is one that will require a religion to learn it cannot turn on its own, as Jews and Christians have had to learn over centuries.

“You do not learn to disbelieve in [violent] power,” explains Jonathan Sacks, Britain’s former chief rabbi, in a new book, until “you find yourself using it against the members of your own people, your own broadly defined creed. That is happening within Islam today.”

Muslims are not alone in this task. In Europe and the United States, mass shootings by either white supremacists or anti-Muslim terrorists require the same assertion of “religious tolerance, mutual respect, and human dignity.” Politics on both sides of the Atlantic, however, is moving away from this ideal.

The cold war was won as much by the West upholding universal values of freedom and individual rights as by nuclear deterrence. The Berlin Wall and Soviet Union collapsed when people behind the Iron Curtain sought those values. If Muslims can also hold fast to these values and declare them, they will be doing their part to defeat terrorism.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Obama’s call for Muslims to stand up
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today