For Mideast's democracy deficit, a Turkish delight

Voters in Turkey's June 7 parliamentary election set a model for a region in need of democratic ways to reconcile domestic differences over religion, ethnicity, and basic freedoms.

Reuters
A supporter of the Peoples' Democratic Party (HDP) cheers during a celebration for the party's strong showing in Turkey's parliamentary election June 8.

Fair elections remain rare among Middle Eastern nations, one reason so many of them still settle their internal disputes by force. Turkey has long been an exception. It has often been a model for its Muslim neighbors in how a democracy can reconcile domestic differences over religion, ethnicity, or basic rights. This was especially true in a June 7 election. It showed Turkey can still inspire the region for the better with high levels of trust and pluralism.

In a vote for a new parliament, Turks sent a few powerful messages that should resonate in a region trying to overcome a democracy deficit four years after a faltering Arab Spring:

First is Turkey’s enthusiasm for democracy itself. Turnout at the ballot box was 86 percent. In addition, voters punished President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan for his attempts to curtail freedoms and to take on more powers for himself. His ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP), which has held power since 2002, lost its majority in parliament.

Voters remember how he violently suppressed the antigovernment protests that began in Istanbul’s Gezi Park in 2013. And until recently, Turkey had the highest number of journalists in jail, a sign of how much Mr. Erdoğan tries to prevent dissent.

Second was the surprise political embrace of Turkey’s large ethnic minority, the Kurds. The Peoples’ Democratic Party, which is Kurdish based and was formed only a few years ago, took nearly 12 percent of the vote, gaining seats in parliament for the first time. It also attracted many non-Kurds for its economic and political stands. Just a few years ago, Turkey was at war with Kurds in many parts of the country. In addition, parliament now also includes two other minorities, Yazidi and Roma, as well as four Christians.

Third, despite the AKP’s conservative Islamist stand on the role of Muslim women in society, the election saw a big jump in the number of women deputies in parliament, from 79 to 98. This is a signal of a more inclusive society. “We do not want division in this society. We want to grow and develop together,” said Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, head of the secular Republican People’s Party, which fielded many female candidates.

Turkey’s history as a dominant force in the Middle East, along with its large population and geographic proximity to other regional powers, gives it a special influence. It has many internal tensions, as do other countries, but so far it is trying to resolve them through peaceful politics. With wars in Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and Libya, and with Egypt sliding back to dictatorship, the Turkish example is more necessary than ever. Turkey’s voters delivered.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.