When children stand up to terror

After the mass killing of children in Pakistan, students in India hold vigils or say prayers for the victims. Such cross-border empathy by children should not only change leaders in Pakistan and India but help global efforts against terrorism.

AP Photo
Schoolgirls in Mumbai, India, offer prayers Wednesday for victims killed in a Taliban attack on a military-run school in Peshawar, Pakistan, Dec. 17.

The terrorist attack on a Pakistani school Tuesday continues to evoke a global outcry. Even the Taliban in Afghanistan has condemned the Taliban group in Pakistan that took credit for slaughtering 148 people, of whom 132 were children. In Pakistan, tens of thousands of people held candlelight vigils nationwide, holding up signs saying “Enough!”

But the most touching and perhaps meaningful reaction took place in India, Pakistan’s longtime adversary and a victim itself of Pakistani-led terror over a territorial dispute between the two countries.

On Wednesday, Indian students in thousands of schools and colleges observed two minutes of silence or wrote messages in their scrapbooks for the young victims. “We also prayed for the quick recovery of the injured students and the grieving family members,” one school official told The Times of India.

In New Delhi, student Shivek Endlaw told the BBC, “I want to tell my friends in Pakistan that they should not bow to terror. They have to be strong. More and more should go to schools to defy this threat.”

Even members of India’s movie industry, Bollywood, spoke out. Film star Hrithik Roshan, for example, sent this message to his fans in both India and Pakistan:

“We are not helpless.... The people who kill in anger feel a cause to do so.... Anger is something we all feel, but we haven’t learned to resolve it with love.... You want to do something about the children who lost their lives in Peshawar, then wage a war against your own anger every time someone causes you pain.”

India’s show of support was encouraged by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who phoned his counterpart in Pakistan to offer condolences. Mr. Modi termed the attack an “assault against the entire humanity,” saying “the world is getting disturbingly accustomed to acts of terror.” Indeed, the United Nations estimates 230 million children live in countries torn by conflict.

For nearly 20 years, India has been a leader in pushing the UN to adopt the Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism. The proposed treaty would obligate countries to deny safe haven to terrorists. Despite a rise in the number of terrorist groups, such as Boko Haram in Nigeria and Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, the UN has yet to find a consensus on a definition of terror or agree on how to end it.

In the days since the attack in Peshawar, Pakistan and its two neighbors, India and Afghanistan, have drawn closer in agreeing on ways to counter terrorist groups. When the children of India and Pakistan see their shared humanity more clearly than many adults in both countries, national leaders often need to cooperate.

President Obama will visit India in late January while his top officials will hold strategic talks with Pakistan at the same time. Given how this tragedy has spawned a moment of goodwill between the two countries, he can help them to continue saying “Enough!” to terror. That would be a big step toward pushing the rest of the world to come together on an antiterrorism treaty.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to When children stand up to terror
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today