Obama's Cuban invasion

In opening official ties with Cuba, President Obama made sure to focus on the Cuban people more than the Castro regime. Globalization, such as the Internet, has empowered individuals, making governments less important to the forces of change.

People in Havana watch as Cuba's President Raul Castro speaks during a Dec. 17 broadcast about new official ties with the US .

When President Obama announced Dec. 17 that the United States would normalize ties with Cuba, his first words were not about the Castro regime. Rather he said the US was altering its relationship with the Cuban people. That point reflects how, in today’s globalized world, people more than governments are driving change.

The big surprise in the announcement is not about the new official ties after more than half a century. Rather, it is that Cuba and the US took so long to catch up with the global changes that have made their frozen relations seem so archaic.

Long gone are the 20th-century constructs that kept them apart: the cold war, anti-colonialism, anti-US rhetoric in Latin America, Marxism, and big-power positioning of nuclear missiles. A younger generation of Cuban-Americans in Florida has shifted views on the US embargo. Few in Cuba believe in communism.

The two nations now need to be bound by those things that are uniting the world rather than the things of the past that have kept them apart.

Governments matter less today as more individuals are empowered by the rapid spread of ideas, travel, and telecommunications. Nongovernmental groups, known as civil society, act as a source of change more than government does.

That is why Mr. Obama insisted Cuba’s activists have a seat at the table when Cuba is finally allowed to attend the Summit of the Americas this April. Civil society and citizens, not just leaders, “are shaping our future,” the president said.

Obama is banking on a flood of private investment and travel to move Cuba away from its dictatorial, anti-market ways. And he has authorized better Internet connections to the island nation.

As more people around the world seek to be online, governments are being forced to change the way they deal with each other. People engagement rather than a trade embargo is a better tactic for change when people in the 21st century have so many more tools that can reach across borders.

The arc of history in recent centuries has been toward more individual freedom. But the ways to promote freedom must change as freedom itself creates better means to reach people who are less free. The US recognition of Cuba is not really of its regime but of its people’s potential. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Obama's Cuban invasion
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today